Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Was anyone else bothered by Biden's "clipping coupons in the stock market" line? [View all]James48
(5,131 posts)1. He was probably confusing stocks with bonds.
And clipping bond coupons was a thing in the olden days.
That's what you did (clipping a coupon) to redeem the bond payout at a scheduled time.
I don't have any idea if they still do that. I guess that just shows how ancient I am.
Here is an article about coupon bonds (bearer bonds without traceable registration, that you get your payout of interrest by clipping the appropriate coupon, mailing it in to the issuer, and then the issuer paid you a check).
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/couponbond.asp
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Was anyone else bothered by Biden's "clipping coupons in the stock market" line? [View all]
thesquanderer
Oct 2019
OP
He sure is up to the minute on foreign policy for those paying attention. And that is what we need
emmaverybo
Oct 2019
#9
The coupon-clipping terminology is still used, according to the WSJ as recently as 2013:
highplainsdem
Oct 2019
#31
Yep, perhaps a dated reference but not off-the-wall. These snap judgment habits we have are a curse.
gulliver
Oct 2019
#61
Happily, all we need is someone trying to rebuild the stuff that has been purposely broken over the
SterlingPound
Oct 2019
#28
True! We don't need another moderate this time. We The People are hungering for a bold progressive.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Oct 2019
#25
NO! Guess Trump doesn't think something like this--that has concern trolls up nights-- will be
emmaverybo
Oct 2019
#8
"why go to the trouble he has to attack Biden?"..because he wants everyone to believe he fears Biden
Perseus
Oct 2019
#22
Go to some RW sites and see the ammo ready to go on other candidates. It makes no sense
emmaverybo
Oct 2019
#29
It was another anachronism that makes Millenials shake their heads in wonder.
maxsolomon
Oct 2019
#10
Not I. A three hour debate, I'm not going to dwell on a half dozen words.....
George II
Oct 2019
#11
He spoke for about 16 minutes. Regardless, he's prone to head scratching moments.
thesquanderer
Oct 2019
#46
It'll be trump. But if not, yes, i believe he could. Better than the other top candidates.
oldsoftie
Oct 2019
#44
Well said and I don't even know if I will be voting for him in the primary.
TidalWave46
Oct 2019
#38
Most here still think they work. But they dont because there arent enough to tax.
oldsoftie
Oct 2019
#45
No - I'm bothered by Trump giving us the finger regarding our national security and civil liberties.
Skya Rhen
Oct 2019
#41
And he did what they all do; start an answer & then change to some bullet point.
oldsoftie
Oct 2019
#63
You would think that our candidate would have a clear advantage of coherence over Trump
jcgoldie
Oct 2019
#56
