Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: Bernie backs up Gabbard (This, to me, completely disqualifies Bernie) [View all]progree
(12,975 posts)128. Well feel free to weigh in on this thread and tell them how you feel
Last edited Tue Oct 22, 2019, 09:45 AM - Edit history (1)
and set joentokyo straight too while you're at it.
https://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/we-need-to-check-this-right-here-who-on-jpr-is-still-supporting-russiagate-after-this-and-why/
OP: We need to check this right here. Who on JPR is STILL supporting Russiagate after this .and why?
joentokyo #192066 - I have never seen a post at JPR in support of Russiagate. Have there been any?
OP: We need to check this right here. Who on JPR is STILL supporting Russiagate after this .and why?
joentokyo #192066 - I have never seen a post at JPR in support of Russiagate. Have there been any?
And show me a single post in that thread or anywhere at that site that argues that the Russians influenced the election enough to change the outcome.
I've been an "occasional reader" for 3 years, enough to read at the very least a few thousand posts, and many opinions about Russiagate, ranging from it's total bullshit, to, yes, they did some things, but it was the hated corrupt warmonger queen that lost her own election etc. etc. So yes, there's quite a range of opinion over there
Oh, I have no doubt that there are a few stray posts amongst the hundreds of thousands on that site where somebody did argue that Russian efforts were enough to make a difference, and that's why I gave myself a little wiggle room by saying "virtually unanimous"
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
175 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BREAKING: Bernie backs up Gabbard (This, to me, completely disqualifies Bernie) [View all]
scheming daemons
Oct 2019
OP
Being in the military is a not an immunization from advancing positions that are not in the best..
Cha
Oct 2019
#130
He was never on my radar so I hope this is it for him and he just goes away..n/t
monmouth4
Oct 2019
#2
Not exactly unpredictable given the lingering animosity between Sanders and Clinton...
hlthe2b
Oct 2019
#5
It is not. She has been trying to subvert the Democratic party from the start.
scheming daemons
Oct 2019
#12
They certainly stayed silent when Trump and the Republicans were lobbing insults Hillary's way.
W_HAMILTON
Oct 2019
#41
I think next time I'll say "sibling site" so it doesn't sound like I'm equating women with the
progree
Oct 2019
#56
Maybe he shouldn't be siding with those trying to subvert the Democratic party
scheming daemons
Oct 2019
#14
Maybe people should provide actual evidence when accusing Democratic figures of subverting
Tiggeroshii
Oct 2019
#17
As you knew, a week later she said it wasn't rigged. The DNC rigging the election is a debunked CT.
betsuni
Oct 2019
#66
Defending her country has NOTHING to do with where she stands on the issues, or if she knowingly or
still_one
Oct 2019
#11
I hope you see it just as bad when Mayor Pete, Beto O Rourke and Booker also gave strong defenses of
Tiggeroshii
Oct 2019
#140
Sanders top campaign staff will be working for Gabbard in a couple of months. NT
TidalWave46
Oct 2019
#21
Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of Vermont...
LanternWaste
Oct 2019
#144
Assets are persons within organisations or countries being spied upon who provide information
Celerity
Oct 2019
#82
That is correct. Please read the link I included in the post you're answering. nt
LAS14
Oct 2019
#150
Bernie is correct. I would add that extraordinary claims need at least a little proof.
JoeOtterbein
Oct 2019
#91
Maybe a condiment. Say Mayo, but no lettuce, tomato or onion let alone...
JoeOtterbein
Oct 2019
#102
I'm sorry but JUST being a vet is no guarantee of a sterling character.
BlancheSplanchnik
Oct 2019
#114