Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Nate Silver/538-Warren's Wealth Tax Isn't The Slam Dunk Progressives Want It To Be [View all]peggysue2
(12,542 posts)8. The question of whether a Wealth Tax could pass constitutional muster is real
Doesn't mean it would absolutely fail in the courts but it would most definitely be challenged, delaying the funds Warren plans to use for her ambitious social programs. And there are inherent problems with the proposed Wealth Tax that a number of European countries have experienced, not the least of which are administrative, implementation and enforcement nightmares. Then there's the biggie in the room: the actual amount of collected revenue minus the costs.
I think most Americans across the board want the richy-rich to pay their fair share. The question is what is the quickest, most effective and reliable way to do that. The 538 article points out that the Wealth Tax is not the as-advertised, guaranteed silver bullet.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nate Silver/538-Warren's Wealth Tax Isn't The Slam Dunk Progressives Want It To Be [View all]
Gothmog
Oct 2019
OP
No, but they should be determined by what feasibly can become law and what's a pipe dream
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#13
Nate/538 needs to stick to empirical observations/analysis instead of trying to influence polls.
aikoaiko
Oct 2019
#10
It really is a well written article that doesn't bypass the hard facts. I appreciate anyone chiming
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#14
I just gotta to ask......................when Congress gave a tax cut to the 1%
turbinetree
Oct 2019
#12
Seriously? Why the hell does this have to be explained on a "Democratic" website?
progressoid
Oct 2019
#43
Hopefully, 1890s levels of wealth inequality aren't what any Democrat wants them to be.
BlueWI
Oct 2019
#64