Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Smh.. BS.."I get a little bit tired of Democrats who defend a cruel, dysfunctional health care.." [View all]Gothmog
(182,783 posts)120. Choices for Financing Medicare for All: A Preliminary Analysis
This is from a non-partisan think group that is well respected http://www.crfb.org/papers/choices-financing-medicare-all-preliminary-analysis
Proposals to adopt single-payer health care in the United States have grown in popularity in recent years, as numerous lawmakers and presidential candidates have embraced Medicare for All. However, few have grappled with how to finance the new costs imposed on the federal government. By most estimates, Medicare for All would cost the federal government about $30 trillion over the next decade. How this cost is financed would have considerable distributional, economic, and policy implications.
In the coming months, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget will publish a detailed analysis describing numerous ways to finance Medicare for All and the consequences and trade-offs associated with each choice. This paper provides our preliminary estimates of the magnitude of each potential change and a brief discussion of the types of trade-offs policymakers will need to consider.
We find that Medicare for All could be financed with:
Each of these choices would have consequences for the distribution of income, growth in the economy, and ability to raise new revenue. Some of these consequences could be balanced against each other by adopting a combination approach that includes smaller versions of several of the options as well as additional policies.
In the coming months, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget will publish a detailed analysis describing numerous ways to finance Medicare for All and the consequences and trade-offs associated with each choice. This paper provides our preliminary estimates of the magnitude of each potential change and a brief discussion of the types of trade-offs policymakers will need to consider.
We find that Medicare for All could be financed with:
A 32 percent payroll tax
A 25 percent income surtax
A 42 percent value-added tax (VAT)
A mandatory public premium averaging $7,500 per capita the equivalent of $12,000 per individual not otherwise on public insurance
More than doubling all individual and corporate income tax rates
An 80 percent reduction in non-health federal spending
A 108 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increase in the national debt
Impossibly high taxes on high earners, corporations, and the financial sector
A combination of approaches
Each of these choices would have consequences for the distribution of income, growth in the economy, and ability to raise new revenue. Some of these consequences could be balanced against each other by adopting a combination approach that includes smaller versions of several of the options as well as additional policies.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
197 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Smh.. BS.."I get a little bit tired of Democrats who defend a cruel, dysfunctional health care.." [View all]
Cha
Oct 2019
OP
Then you run for Congress and you too can have a ''wonderful'' healthcare plan.
YOHABLO
Oct 2019
#127
Accusing Democrats of defending leaving 87 million Americans uninsured or underinsured.
betsuni
Oct 2019
#7
It's happening. Biden and Warren are getting the "Democrats are the REAL warmongers" thing.
betsuni
Oct 2019
#12
It's called campaigning. I recall he said it could be done in 8 years in 2016. Now it's 2 YEARS!!!
ehrnst
Dec 2019
#176
What is a bigger issue than people going bankrupt and destitute because of healthcare bills?
YOHABLO
Oct 2019
#128
Um M4A is not a pipe dream Sen Klobuchar, unlike your ambition to become POTUS.
YOHABLO
Oct 2019
#102
Ewww, I am assuming that your post is more about the post before mine, than mine.
pazzyanne
Oct 2019
#105
When someone smears and denigrates the Democratic party it creates division and distrust.
NurseJackie
Oct 2019
#41
He's been in DC for almost 30 years, what has he changed in that time, anything?
George II
Oct 2019
#46
Others have made real change - Elizabeth Warren - CFPB, Pelosi got the ACA passed,
ehrnst
Oct 2019
#64
So when one can't work well with other people, then one doesn't accomplish much. (nt)
ehrnst
Oct 2019
#94
It was definitely a team effort and without Pelosi, Harry Reid and other leaders it never
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#84
You don't seem to be aware that he wasn't going to try to pass it, but Pelosi assured him
ehrnst
Oct 2019
#93
This isn't RW talking points. It's the reality of how several here see it
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#85
When trying to pass real legislation whom ever it might be, you've got to have real allies and
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#83
Kinda ridiculous. If you don't even know it yourself, you've answered your own question.
MrsCoffee
Nov 2019
#152
That's something he's never addressed. He want to "outlaw" private insurance companies, but....
George II
Oct 2019
#48
So let's keep protecting the insurance companies and denying people access to care?
dflprincess
Dec 2019
#190
I got an email this morning with that as the subject line. It's a direct attack....
George II
Oct 2019
#43
If Sanders wanted change, he'd accept Public Option is the fastest way to a single payer system.
Hoyt
Oct 2019
#44
Support for a public option has been increasing, and for Medicare-for-All has been decreasing
Gothmog
Oct 2019
#119
Joe Biden's health care plan will be ready to go the day he's sworn into office
Gothmog
Oct 2019
#134
Elizabeth Warren's latest health plan is causing concerns for some centrist, moderate and rural Demo
Gothmog
Nov 2019
#139
The math for Warren's health-care plan adds up if you accept its ludicrous premise
Gothmog
Nov 2019
#142
If the system allows for millions to be uninsured or people to go bankrupt from medical bills...
aikoaiko
Nov 2019
#155
The needed response is that ALL DEMOCRATS HAVE WORKED FOR BETTER HEALTH COVERAGE AND ARE
karynnj
Dec 2019
#171
False dilemma fallacy, Senator Sanders. YOUR MFA is not the only humane or progressive path to UHC
ehrnst
Dec 2019
#175
These gripes need to be directed at FUCKING RUSSIAPUBLICANS, for fucks sake. nt
UniteFightBack
Dec 2019
#191
I don't think that is a wise strategy if he would like Democrats to vote for him. nt
UniteFightBack
Dec 2019
#194
Can someone please remind which voters Mr. Sanders is trying to court? IT AIN'T FUCKING DEMS
UniteFightBack
Dec 2019
#192