Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Nate Silver/538-Warren's Wealth Tax Isn't The Slam Dunk Progressives Want It To Be [View all]BlueWI
(1,736 posts)64. Hopefully, 1890s levels of wealth inequality aren't what any Democrat wants them to be.
The left of the party is proposing actions to address this ongoing issue, which worsened even during Obama/Biden.
The harmful consequences of concentrated wealth are numerous and obvious, and American political discourse has been woefully short on potential solutions. Shooting the messenger with no alternative solutions or analysis is the very definition of elitism in the service of oligarchy.
Maybe superpacs are the answer? I guess we'll see.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nate Silver/538-Warren's Wealth Tax Isn't The Slam Dunk Progressives Want It To Be [View all]
Gothmog
Oct 2019
OP
No, but they should be determined by what feasibly can become law and what's a pipe dream
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#13
Nate/538 needs to stick to empirical observations/analysis instead of trying to influence polls.
aikoaiko
Oct 2019
#10
It really is a well written article that doesn't bypass the hard facts. I appreciate anyone chiming
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#14
I just gotta to ask......................when Congress gave a tax cut to the 1%
turbinetree
Oct 2019
#12
Seriously? Why the hell does this have to be explained on a "Democratic" website?
progressoid
Oct 2019
#43
Hopefully, 1890s levels of wealth inequality aren't what any Democrat wants them to be.
BlueWI
Oct 2019
#64