Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Nate Silver/538-Warren's Wealth Tax Isn't The Slam Dunk Progressives Want It To Be [View all]BlueWI
(1,736 posts)67. I appreciate the post
and I would be unable to compare the legality of each approach, myself. This issue is being vetted in public, thanks to the critique of Sanders, Warren, Reich, Stiglitz, etc. of the issue of wealth inequality. I'd be most interested in objective assessments of this legal question.
Your current source includes the following line in its request for support: "The liberal media are terrified of the truth, especially when it leads to uncomfortable questions about their own leftist worldview." This is a broad brush statement that might be good for fundraising in certain circles, but it doesn't suggest a fair-minded approach to policies and people that are associated with the "left."
All the same, thanks for responding.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nate Silver/538-Warren's Wealth Tax Isn't The Slam Dunk Progressives Want It To Be [View all]
Gothmog
Oct 2019
OP
No, but they should be determined by what feasibly can become law and what's a pipe dream
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#13
Nate/538 needs to stick to empirical observations/analysis instead of trying to influence polls.
aikoaiko
Oct 2019
#10
It really is a well written article that doesn't bypass the hard facts. I appreciate anyone chiming
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#14
I just gotta to ask......................when Congress gave a tax cut to the 1%
turbinetree
Oct 2019
#12
Seriously? Why the hell does this have to be explained on a "Democratic" website?
progressoid
Oct 2019
#43
Hopefully, 1890s levels of wealth inequality aren't what any Democrat wants them to be.
BlueWI
Oct 2019
#64