Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

ritapria

(1,812 posts)

13. The author worked for the Gore and the Mondale Campaigns

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Wed Nov 6, 2019, 08:45 AM

Nov 2019

That worked out real well .…..

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Brookings' Bill Galston: Elizabeth Warren's Health-Care Hara-Kiri [View all] highplainsdem Nov 2019 OP

Let me be Blunt evertonfc Nov 2019 #1

Do we really need to sacrifice congress like we did to get the ACA passed? And Kahuna7 Nov 2019 #15

Breaking: Wall Street doesn't like Warren crazytown Nov 2019 #2

Galston isn't Wall Street. And you know that if you read the OP. highplainsdem Nov 2019 #3

DLC crazytown Nov 2019 #4

He's a liberal. You don't have to be far left to be a liberal. highplainsdem Nov 2019 #5

What I know is it's a hit piece crazytown Nov 2019 #6

Partisan? Galston's party is Democratic. You're apparently taking the position that no one highplainsdem Nov 2019 #8

One can be partisan in a primary contest. crazytown Nov 2019 #10

Trump couldn't have written that intelligent an opinion piece if his life depended on it. highplainsdem Nov 2019 #11

It's a big problem BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #22

Post removed Post removed Nov 2019 #19

If the country thinks like Bill Galston does then we are in deeper trouble than we thought Perseus Nov 2019 #16

Did Debbie Wassermann Shultz write this OP? INdemo Nov 2019 #7

What part of "Brookings' Bill Galston" didn't you undeerstand? highplainsdem Nov 2019 #9

This is what I find so annoying LeftTurn3623 Nov 2019 #12

The reason they can find money for endless wars, and justify trillions in tax cuts for the wealthy? sop Nov 2019 #27

The author worked for the Gore and the Mondale Campaigns ritapria Nov 2019 #13

Gore won the popular vote, and if the Republican-controlled Supreme Court hadn't stopped the highplainsdem Nov 2019 #14

That has nothing to do with whether Dems/Americans will vote for a 30 trillion... brush Nov 2019 #18

Ding, ding, ding! peggysue2 Nov 2019 #21

She's weakened herself with this. Too bad as she was doing well with the plans for everything. brush Nov 2019 #25

They were nominees, which is something Bernie will never be. BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #23

... Cha Nov 2019 #31

Oy Hangdog Slim Nov 2019 #17

That is irrelevant as to whether M4A is feasable dansolo Nov 2019 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #24

I have been leading towards Warren. Happy Hoosier Nov 2019 #26

"A gaffe is when a politician tells the truth, some obvious truth (s)he isn't supposed to say." - sop Nov 2019 #28

I disagree.... Happy Hoosier Nov 2019 #30

We'll get to MFA quicker with Public Option. One reason is Democrats can get elected on that. Hoyt Nov 2019 #29