Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Renew Deal

(85,175 posts)
117. Who should go first?
Wed Nov 6, 2019, 10:52 AM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rural whites have appointed themselves gatekeepers of our political system. dalton99a Nov 2019 #1
You got that right BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #29
Rural white checking in: ramen Nov 2019 #59
in some ways I wish I lived there LeftTurn3623 Nov 2019 #65
This isn't about YOU personally. Act_of_Reparation Nov 2019 #96
I think both will start to lose their outsized influence as people eyes are opened. Dream Girl Nov 2019 #2
I don't think it will have the same impact this year and even less in years to come. Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #8
Even on the repug side, didn't that loon Michelle Backman win Iowa? brush Nov 2019 #47
She did...she I looked it up Bachman won Iowa...dear God no more Iowa. Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #48
I wish the candidate would quit going to every cow pie chucking contest in Iowa. 33taw Nov 2019 #3
Amen exboyfil Nov 2019 #4
When you "group" Primary States, you shift the race to a TV campaign... brooklynite Nov 2019 #12
In a country where you represent 330 million people exboyfil Nov 2019 #16
The option you have is what we do today... brooklynite Nov 2019 #19
Iowa is almost the middle when it comes to population. TidalWave46 Nov 2019 #89
It's increasingly been a Reality TV Campaign since the beginning MarcA Nov 2019 #64
The party unfortunately can't make Iowa and NH change their dates. brush Nov 2019 #52
Where do you live in Wisconsin? Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #21
About 25 miles from Stevens Point. 33taw Nov 2019 #26
I bet. You are a couple of hours from Janesville as I recall...which is a city in name only. Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #33
I am familiar with Janesville. I actually grew up just north of Milwaukee. 33taw Nov 2019 #46
We loved Janesville...although the winter was a shock...I was told that it rarely snowed...too cold. Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #51
Obama's win in Iowa in 2008 gave him a boost that Hillary & Edwards couldn't overcome Kaleva Nov 2019 #5
Also, Clinton finished 4th in Iowa Renew Deal Nov 2019 #7
2008 Iowa Caucus Results (Dukakis ran in 1988) aggiesal Nov 2019 #57
Exactly. Obama disproved SO many things like this. But some have to keep pushing it. oldsoftie Nov 2019 #9
False. Obama would have gotten even more delegates Stuy Nov 2019 #13
That has nothing to do with the premise of this OP. Its total bullshit. Iowa has little power. oldsoftie Nov 2019 #24
Thank you!! Thekaspervote Nov 2019 #30
Thank you.. whathehell Nov 2019 #41
One black person overcoming the odds does NOT disprove the existence of racism StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #91
Nobody said racism no longer exists. Just that this article is ridiculous. oldsoftie Nov 2019 #109
Obama would have won by a larger margin in SC, if SC went first Stuy Nov 2019 #11
Without winning Iowa, Obama might not have Kaleva Nov 2019 #34
true. but essentially meaningless stopdiggin Nov 2019 #58
Things have changed since Obama. The voters we need are not in Iowa...and they do not resemble the Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #22
Are you unhappy with the results of the last 3 primaries and caucuses held in NH and Iowa? Kaleva Nov 2019 #35
I don't even remember who won...which shows how insignificant it is ...I am unhappy with the number Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #38
And the media really did a number on us during that campaign ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #54
Do you recall that Florida and Michigan lost their delegates in 2008...would Pres. Obama have won if Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #55
Wouldn't the publicity of winning any "first" state boost votes and PR? Renew Deal Nov 2019 #6
True that...and it is essential given our party's diversity that we include AA voters in any first Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #23
Someone is always going to have an undue influence Renew Deal Nov 2019 #39
Pick a smaller state like North Carolina...which has diversity then...but that is no excuse to shut Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #45
Not sure why you're calling NC a "smaller state." cwydro Nov 2019 #115
True, but it always seems to be the same people - the white ones - who are allowed to have StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #93
The only way to do it is to have groups of states vote first Renew Deal Nov 2019 #110
There are small states that resemble the Democratic Party more than Iowa...and as another Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #100
Should SC remain in the first 4? Renew Deal Nov 2019 #111
No caucus state should be first...they are undemocratic and don't even measure the full vote. Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #113
Are you OK with them going first if they have a primary? Renew Deal Nov 2019 #116
I still think we could choose a better state to reflect our diversity...but it would be better. At Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #123
I'm quite sure if the first two primaries were in states with a large black and urban population StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #92
It doesn't mean we shouldn't do it. States that influence the nomination process the most should Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #99
I agree with you StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #105
Who should go first? Renew Deal Nov 2019 #117
Since people of color have "gone first" for centuries, let's let white folks go first this time StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #118
The problem with having discussions like this Renew Deal Nov 2019 #120
You didn't ask me for a solution for fixing the process. You asked who should go first StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #121
I hear this complaint every Election cycle... brooklynite Nov 2019 #10
You didn't mention Georgia, Michigan or Nevada Stuy Nov 2019 #14
+1 dalton99a Nov 2019 #15
Nevada is part of the first four... brooklynite Nov 2019 #20
Iowa and New Hampshire only matter because we let them. Perhaps this will be the year this Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #25
Thank you!! Thekaspervote Nov 2019 #31
Biden voters are loyal. I doubt either New Hampshire or Iowa will sway them. Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #36
So here's the problem ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #67
The 2008 CA primary was early. February tishaLA Nov 2019 #78
I thought it was early in 2008 as well ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #79
OK so wikipedia actually shows ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #80
California early voting begins on the day of the Iowa Caucus... brooklynite Nov 2019 #82
But they are not counted until June ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #85
The Presidential Primary is March 3rd. brooklynite Nov 2019 #88
Cool, I thought it was still in June n/t aggiesal Nov 2019 #95
Yes. cwydro Nov 2019 #108
Iowa Democrats are pretty damn diversified. Piss freely on Iowa GOP but watch your aim. IADEMO2004 Nov 2019 #17
I'm sorry, but no Stuy Nov 2019 #18
Iowa no longer represents our party in terms of diversity. We are ignoring a huge part of our Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #27
Which state does? progressoid Nov 2019 #60
There are other states that are diverse...North Carolina for example and Georgia...you show Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #73
Top 10: California. Texas. Hawaii. New Jersey. New York. New Mexico. Maryland. Florida. progressoid Nov 2019 #83
Black women gave us the midterms in places like Virginia...I am talking about including a vital part Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #86
Perhaps the answer is to run some states together in the beginning...like a mini super Tuesday... Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #87
Sure. progressoid Nov 2019 #97
Actually that is not true. I work for the campaign...he received much support after that was Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #98
Great. progressoid Nov 2019 #101
I think the first states are important but shouldn't be the be all end all...consider that Bill Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #102
Iowa is also a media market where Bettie Nov 2019 #28
I think you're confusing hate for a state with contempt for the system BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #32
Iowa Democrats are representative of the Iowa part of our party. IADEMO2004 Nov 2019 #40
I have no idea how many and I'm not sure I take your point anyway. BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #43
Back the horse up BannonsLiver, we can only elect people to represent us from those who live in Iowa Peacetrain Nov 2019 #49
+1 progressoid Nov 2019 #44
I won't switch... Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #53
That doesn't matter if we field candidates that can't win a general which happens more often than Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #37
These are the Demographics of Iowa: Sloumeau Nov 2019 #114
Iowa and Iowa Democratic Party are not the same. I've seen Demographics of Iowa posted 1000X. IADEMO2004 Nov 2019 #119
Why do the other 48 states put up with it? Snake Plissken Nov 2019 #42
I actually think that the election days are set in many state laws. 33taw Nov 2019 #50
National Dem Party can refuse to seat delegates from calendar jumping states. IADEMO2004 Nov 2019 #61
and having a single day primary stopdiggin Nov 2019 #63
I am not sure about all states, but many Stateswith primaries pay the costs of elections. 33taw Nov 2019 #69
Florida and Michigan tried to change the primary order and lost their delegates in 2008...the DNC Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #74
So which state should we start in? progressoid Nov 2019 #56
Well now you did it. LOL IADEMO2004 Nov 2019 #62
... progressoid Nov 2019 #84
so what we need is a diverse state(s) with very low population stopdiggin Nov 2019 #66
Now THAT I would like to see. progressoid Nov 2019 #70
bush plane and mukluks stopdiggin Nov 2019 #71
In January! progressoid Nov 2019 #72
What about Georgia or North Carolina? And Bill Clinton lost both Iowa and New Hampshire. Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #75
Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina. TidalWave46 Nov 2019 #94
Eventually a wealth backed Independent will win the Presidency MarcA Nov 2019 #68
I hope not...one has only to look at the UK to see how once you end a two party system...you Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #76
SCOTUS A gift that keeps on giving. Citizens United IADEMO2004 Nov 2019 #103
I have some issues here LeftTurn3623 Nov 2019 #77
It is institutional racism whether by intent or by tradition to continue to allow a small white Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #104
And that institutional racism is enabled when people say, in response to it being identified, "but StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #124
Exactly...no system can be perfect but almost any solution I suggested would be better than what we Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #125
Gotta start somewhere. Does it really matter where? TCJ70 Nov 2019 #81
"This is what institutional racism looks like." Thank you StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #90
IA and NH Having the Power to Wean the Democratic Field Is A Sore Spot For Many Dems. n/t Indykatie Nov 2019 #106
Dems should replace IA and NH with states that resemble the nation and the party. LonePirate Nov 2019 #107
Not sure why the last paragraph calls out this party. redqueen Nov 2019 #112
I've been saying to get rid of Iowa+New Hampshire on this forum Blue_Tires Nov 2019 #122
Caucuses place the the disabled community at a disadvantage, too. Politicub Nov 2019 #126
From Larry Sabato Gothmog Nov 2019 #127
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»The white privilege of Io...»Reply #117