Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Bill Gates on a Wealth Tax [View all]Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)14. I don't know how much she "deserves."
But I don't believe it's a billion dollars. Nor do many others.
Abolish Billionaires
A radical idea is gaining adherents on the left. Its the perfect way to blunt tech-driven inequality.
I like to use this column to explore maximalist policy visions positions we might aspire to over time rather than push through tomorrow. Abolishing billionaires might not sound like a practical idea, but if you think about it as a long-term goal in light of todays deepest economic ills, it feels anything but radical. Instead, banishing billionaires seeking to cut their economic power, working to reduce their political power and attempting to question their social status is a pithy, perfectly encapsulated vision for surviving the digital future.
Were already seeing these effects now. A few superstar corporations, many in tech, account for the bulk of American corporate profits, while most of the share of economic growth since the 1970s has gone to a small number of the countrys richest people.
But the problem is poised to get worse. Artificial intelligence is creating prosperous new industries that dont employ very many workers; left unchecked, technology is creating a world where a few billionaires control an unprecedented share of global wealth.
But abolishment does not involve only economic policy. It might also take the form of social and political opprobrium. For at least 20 years, weve been in a devastating national love affair with billionaires a dalliance that the tech industry has championed more than any other.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/06/opinion/abolish-billionaires-tax.html
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your question suggests that one must be a billionaire to be a humanitarian.
Dark n Stormy Knight
Nov 2019
#15
Here's some more thoughtful reasoning you and your snarky pals can snootily sneer at:
Dark n Stormy Knight
Nov 2019
#20
Well, I used the presidency as shorthand. It doesn't have to be that exactly.
Dark n Stormy Knight
Nov 2019
#17
I have an issue with it, but money doesnt get you elected. YOU have to perform.
oldsoftie
Nov 2019
#48
That would leave him with only 104 billion. And that's just the first year.
Midnight Writer
Nov 2019
#36
I'm with you. I was just looking at your numbers and thinking of what Gates said.
Midnight Writer
Nov 2019
#42
How does no one ever get this? There arent enough of them NOW to raise whats needed.
oldsoftie
Nov 2019
#49
no person has ever earned a billion dollars. That's policy failure. gates being a great example
Kurt V.
Nov 2019
#23
No, its not. Because 100s of billions, if not trillions, go untaxed & unaccounted for.
oldsoftie
Nov 2019
#50
"stated income" jobs. Forget offshore stuff & assets. I'm talking straight income.
oldsoftie
Nov 2019
#56