Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Zandi walks it back: Warren's plans add up, and her MFA plan won't raise taxes on the middle class [View all]
Link to tweet
It's no secret that I'm not a fan of Medicare for All. That's why I'm impressed that Senator Elizabeth Warren's campaign reached out to me to independently review her proposed financing plan for the program. Her numbers add up and her plan fully finances the program without imposing any new taxes on middle-class families.
...Criticism that Warren is overestimating the revenue she can hope to generate from the wealth tax is overblown. She addresses these concerns by saying she will empower and appropriately fund the Internal Revenue Service to go after those who willfully avoid paying their taxes. Enforcing our tax laws and best practices on tax compliance can generate significant revenue. Closing America's tax gap the difference between taxes owed and taxes paid would help Warren get the revenue she needs.
To be sure, these aren't the only taxes on the wealthy that Warren has proposed. In addition to the wealth tax, which she also uses to pay for her child care, college affordability and K-12 education plans, she wants a larger estate tax to pay for her housing plan, higher payroll and net investment income taxes would go toward her Social Security reforms, and she supports repealing Trump's tax cuts for high-income households to generate even more revenue for her plans. With this combination of tax changes, there is a reasonable concern that the wealthy will work overtime to avoid paying.
But once we start to consider the broader consequences of the totality of Warren's plans, it's incumbent we do so with regard to both her tax proposals but also the investments those taxes will fund. Based on my own analyses, Warren's plans for child care, housing and green manufacturing would spur economic growth and produce more tax revenue. Considering the economic impact of all her proposals (an analysis no one has done yet), it is very possible that total government revenues generated by her plans will exceed the total amount of new investments she proposes. Criticism that Senator Warren's Medicare for All plan can't be paid for, at least not without putting a greater financial burden on lower- and middle-income Americans, is wrong.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Zandi walks it back: Warren's plans add up, and her MFA plan won't raise taxes on the middle class [View all]
BeyondGeography
Nov 2019
OP
Yeah ok...I do not believe it...we will pay for it one way or the other...and since it would destroy
Demsrule86
Nov 2019
#1
Attempting to pass MFA and implement it will take away needed reforms for the ACA...just
Demsrule86
Nov 2019
#17
The promise of increased tax revenue through economic growth is a hollow one.
HerbChestnut
Nov 2019
#3
I never equated the two other than to say both are being justified by promising future revenues.
HerbChestnut
Nov 2019
#18
Fair enough point. I actually favor tweaks to the ACA to close the coverage gap,
Blue_true
Nov 2019
#19
I think Zandi is having trouble telling the truth. He's not a fan of MFA, and he says he doesn't
Hoyt
Nov 2019
#13
Another poster equating redistribution to working people with handouts to the wealthiest
BeyondGeography
Nov 2019
#21