Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

BeyondGeography

(41,090 posts)
8. Pathetic, pointless hit job
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 12:38 PM
Nov 2019
Mr. Zucman said in an interview that the analysis did not take into account Ms. Warren’s spending plans, which he said would most likely bolster savings, investment and labor-force participation — and, with them, growth.

“If the government collects $3 trillion in wealth tax revenue, and spends $3 trillion on public infrastructure,” he said, “it’s unclear that there should be a reduction” in the amount of overall investment in the economy.

Another economist who has evaluated Ms. Warren’s plans at her request, Mark Zandi of Moody’s, wrote on Wednesday that his analyses suggested that her spending on “child care, housing and green manufacturing would spur economic growth and produce more tax revenue.”



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ugh... pfeiffer Nov 2019 #1
Yes, slow it's decimation of hope for the 99% OhNo-Really Nov 2019 #2
+1 CentralMass Nov 2019 #4
NYTimes is becoming Putin's Paper imho OhNo-Really Nov 2019 #9
What abject nonsense. tritsofme Nov 2019 #16
Thank you! whathehell Nov 2019 #26
By itself, the wealth tax might slow the economy, but combined with M4A and student debt relief Fiendish Thingy Nov 2019 #3
Wait. What? Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2019 #5
Yeah. Bullshit assumption to produce desired outcome. Voltaire2 Nov 2019 #12
Only one piece of the picture olsondr Nov 2019 #6
You know I never see any plans plans of other candidates scrutinized like Warren's. flying_wahini Nov 2019 #7
Right you are Bradshaw3 Nov 2019 #20
Pathetic, pointless hit job BeyondGeography Nov 2019 #8
They are very good at only giving one piece of the puzzle. vsrazdem Nov 2019 #10
They know it's crap BeyondGeography Nov 2019 #11
Wharton? Isn't that the place that gave drumpf a degree? Bradshaw3 Nov 2019 #13
Have no fear, Biden is here BeyondGeography Nov 2019 #14
Why does the top 1% and top 400 families pay a lower rate than middle class under his plan? Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2019 #17
If that is correct information backtoblue Nov 2019 #18
Wow, Biden's top tax rate isn't much different than drumpf's Bradshaw3 Nov 2019 #19
That graph looks pretty fundraiser-friendly to me BeyondGeography Nov 2019 #21
Oh no you'll be asked if you're saying he can be bought Bradshaw3 Nov 2019 #22
To say the least! Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2019 #23
K&R backtoblue Nov 2019 #15
A preliminary dynamic analysis of the Warren wealth tax from Penn Wharton finds it would reduce GDP Gothmog Nov 2019 #24
That's the same article melman Nov 2019 #25
Bazinga! George II Nov 2019 #28
Reminder! Newest Reality Nov 2019 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Warren Wealth Tax Could S...»Reply #8