Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: MSNBC Is the Most Influential Network Among Liberals--And It's Ignoring Bernie Sanders [View all]Uncle Joe
(64,678 posts)11. These were their metrics.
(snip)
To understand how MSNBC may be shaping the 2020 election, In These Times analyzed the networks August and September coverage of the Democratic presidential contests leading candidatesSen. Bernie Sanders, former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren. We focused on the networks flagship primetime shows: The 11th Hour with Brian Williams, All In with Chris Hayes, The Beat with Ari Melber, Hardball with Chris Matthews, The Last Word with Lawrence ODonnell and The Rachel Maddow Show.
In These Times tallied how often the three candidates were discussed and logged whether the coverage was positive, negative or neutral. For example, while poll results by themselves (whether favorable or unfavorable to a candidate) were simply logged as neutral, commentary about a candidate surging was logged as positive and stagnant as negative. Clips and previews for upcoming segments were not included.
The coverage quickly revealed a pattern. Over the two months, these six programs focused on Biden, often to the exclusion of Warren and Sanders. Sanders received not only the least total coverage (less than one-third of Bidens), but the most negative. As to the substance, MSNBCs reporting revolved around poll results and so-called electability.
After the 2016 presidential election, in which the press was criticized for disproportionately giving Donald Trump $2 billion of free media, MSNBC may be repeating history. While pundits get paid to have opinions, MSNBCs seem to dwell in an alternate reality: As momentum mounts for longstanding liberal goals like single-payer health care and bold climate action, MSNBCs coverage seems devoted, instead, to narrowing the liberal imagination.
(snip)
http://inthesetimes.com/features/msnbc-bernie-sanders-coverage-democratic-primary-media-analysis.html
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
MSNBC Is the Most Influential Network Among Liberals--And It's Ignoring Bernie Sanders [View all]
Uncle Joe
Nov 2019
OP
There's never a bad time for a little Python. There's a clip for every occasion!
NurseJackie
Nov 2019
#10
Too bad that Sanders is such an obscure candidate that nobody knows about him.....
brooklynite
Nov 2019
#2
Plus, the premise of that "In These Times" article is simply not true. I don't know what....
George II
Nov 2019
#7
The word stagnant is negative, one can report polls without commentary as to momentum or
Uncle Joe
Nov 2019
#32
Commentary by pundits, it's almost always about the "horse race" or trivial bullshit,
Uncle Joe
Nov 2019
#42
Mike Gravel Can't Believe His Polling Numbers Neck-And-Neck With Fucking Nobody Like Wayne Messam
Celerity
Nov 2019
#33
I totally agree with you Buzz cook, corporate is the keyword, this isn't the first time
Uncle Joe
Nov 2019
#22
There is a consistency in your attempt to blame the media for Sanders' dismal performance.
LanternWaste
Nov 2019
#21
I dropped cable in 2015. I haven't watched MSNBC since and I'm fine with it.
CentralMass
Nov 2019
#51