Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Ending the filibuster is critical. And only Liz Warren supports ending it. [View all]
https://crooked.com/articles/democrats-delusion-filibuster/I admit Im a Liz Warren fan girl.
But we will get ZERO done if we dont end the filibuster. Republicans will rule via minority forever and block all Democratic action when they are in the minority. UNLESS we get to 51 Senate seats AND end the filibuster.
Thats why Im for Warren for pres, and for Beto to run against Cornyn for Senate. Lets do this!
(Ps Always read Brian Beutler)
In her speech announcing her candidacy earlier this month, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) warned supporters against the temptation to turn the page. Once [Trumps] gone we cant pretend that all of this never happened, she said. By no coincidence, Warren is also one of the few candidates who hasnt run scared from the idea of eliminating the filibuster. Everything stays on the table. You keep it all on the table. Dont take anything off the table.
Her insight is that these objectives are related. You cant defeat antidemocratic forces by cementing their minority rule, and there will thus be no meaningful reckoning for Trump so long as the filibuster remains in place.
The modern history of American politics is one in which tens of millions of voting-age Americans have been cheated out of their democratic choices. After the first election I was old enough to participate in, multiple partisan institutions brought their power to bear to deny the presidency to the candidate who won the most votes and who, in a fair counting, would have won the electoral college as well. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 brought about a mass forgetting of this theft, which in turn allowed President George W. Bush to implement disastrous economic and foreign policies while dodging most questions about how much responsibility his administration bore for not detecting and stopping the attacks. Bush, who should have never served a day in office, appointed two justices to the Supreme Court, both of whom have many years of service ahead of them.
In the eight years between Bush and Trump, under a Democratic president who won both of his elections with substantial popular majorities, Republicans turned the filibuster into a tool of nullification, used routine legislative deadlines and threats of harm to the population as means of extortion, and stole a Supreme Court seat.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ending the filibuster is critical. And only Liz Warren supports ending it. [View all]
EndGOPPropaganda
Feb 2019
OP
loss of the judicial filibuster is why R's are stacking all the courts right now and for decades...
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#1
Exactly how, with R's holding Senate & refusing Garland a hearing or vote, might we have prevailed?
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#6
Gerrymandering for the House, Voter Suppression for Senate. Perhaps you might want to google that...
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#18
Oh, honey, you STILL haven't answered why exactly Merrick Garland would have been confirmed
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#25
That is NOT what I asked. I asked you to address YOUR claim that we could have gotten Garland
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#16
Really, read the article. Keeping the filibuster means submitting to minority GOP rule
EndGOPPropaganda
Feb 2019
#34
I have a degree in political science. I think I know what a filibuster means.
CrossingTheRubicon
Feb 2019
#35
You certainly seem sure of yourself, but I'm not buying what you are selling.
CrossingTheRubicon
Feb 2019
#40
Republicans want the filibuster: they know. Please read these articles.
EndGOPPropaganda
Feb 2019
#43
Nope. The filibuster is why the ACA has been unpopular and therefore vulnerable.
shanny
Feb 2019
#31