Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

EndGOPPropaganda

(1,117 posts)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 07:29 PM Feb 2019

Ending the filibuster is critical. And only Liz Warren supports ending it. [View all]

https://crooked.com/articles/democrats-delusion-filibuster/


I admit I’m a Liz Warren fan girl.
But we will get ZERO done if we don’t end the filibuster. Republicans will rule via minority forever and block all Democratic action when they are in the minority. UNLESS we get to 51 Senate seats AND end the filibuster.

That’s why I’m for Warren for pres, and for Beto to run against Cornyn for Senate. Let’s do this!


(Ps Always read Brian Beutler)

In her speech announcing her candidacy earlier this month, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) warned supporters against the temptation to turn the page. “Once [Trump’s] gone we can’t pretend that all of this never happened,” she said. By no coincidence, Warren is also one of the few candidates who hasn’t run scared from the idea of eliminating the filibuster. “Everything stays on the table. You keep it all on the table. Don’t take anything off the table.”

Her insight is that these objectives are related. You can’t defeat antidemocratic forces by cementing their minority rule, and there will thus be no meaningful reckoning for Trump so long as the filibuster remains in place.

The modern history of American politics is one in which tens of millions of voting-age Americans have been cheated out of their democratic choices. After the first election I was old enough to participate in, multiple partisan institutions brought their power to bear to deny the presidency to the candidate who won the most votes and who, in a fair counting, would have won the electoral college as well. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 brought about a mass forgetting of this theft, which in turn allowed President George W. Bush to implement disastrous economic and foreign policies while dodging most questions about how much responsibility his administration bore for not detecting and stopping the attacks. Bush, who should have never served a day in office, appointed two justices to the Supreme Court, both of whom have many years of service ahead of them.

In the eight years between Bush and Trump, under a Democratic president who won both of his elections with substantial popular majorities, Republicans turned the filibuster into a tool of nullification, used routine legislative deadlines and threats of harm to the population as means of extortion, and stole a Supreme Court seat.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
loss of the judicial filibuster is why R's are stacking all the courts right now and for decades... hlthe2b Feb 2019 #1
If we had been willing to nuke shanny Feb 2019 #4
Exactly how, with R's holding Senate & refusing Garland a hearing or vote, might we have prevailed? hlthe2b Feb 2019 #6
Why were Rs able to take the Senate? shanny Feb 2019 #12
Gerrymandering for the House, Voter Suppression for Senate. Perhaps you might want to google that... hlthe2b Feb 2019 #18
Very helpful in Senate races and governorships. shanny Feb 2019 #20
oh honey shanny Feb 2019 #24
Oh, honey, you STILL haven't answered why exactly Merrick Garland would have been confirmed hlthe2b Feb 2019 #25
See! You can do offense! I'm proud of you. shanny Feb 2019 #26
meh... you are not worth my Friday evening... Knock yourself out. hlthe2b Feb 2019 #27
Yes- bold! Exactly. nm EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #23
Thank you! This is all well explained by Beutler in the article. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #8
Thank you too. shanny Feb 2019 #19
Sorry but this is naive: GOP was just waiting to nuke it EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #13
That is NOT what I asked. I asked you to address YOUR claim that we could have gotten Garland hlthe2b Feb 2019 #16
That wasn't me, and I asked you to address Gorsuch and Kavanaugh EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #21
Sorry but are you aware you are talking to-- shanny Feb 2019 #28
Your twin. hlthe2b Feb 2019 #30
Still waiting... Guess you don't actually have an answer to that, do you? hlthe2b Feb 2019 #22
I'm not convinced. That cuts both ways. mobeau69 Feb 2019 #2
Read this. The filibuster helps only Republicans at this time. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #10
I do not want the filibuster ended. Big Blue Marble Feb 2019 #3
Noooooooo!! Read the article! EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #9
When one party holds the House and Senate it is wasupaloopa Feb 2019 #5
I'm with her. shanny Feb 2019 #7
Keep the filibuster. CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #11
If you want Republicans to have control of America indefinitely, sure EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #15
Nah, I want to be able to stop them. CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #29
Really, read the article. Keeping the filibuster means submitting to minority GOP rule EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #34
I have a degree in political science. I think I know what a filibuster means. CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #35
Must end the filibuster if we want to avoid GOP control for decades. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #37
You certainly seem sure of yourself, but I'm not buying what you are selling. CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #40
Republicans want the filibuster: they know. Please read these articles. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #43
Nope. The filibuster is why we still have the ACA Recursion Feb 2019 #14
Nope. The filibuster is why the ACA has been unpopular and therefore vulnerable. shanny Feb 2019 #31
I agree with this. Volaris Feb 2019 #17
Well said. shanny Feb 2019 #32
If we don't remove the filibuster, 90%-95% of the Democratic agenda is DOA. LonePirate Feb 2019 #33
Right. And the GOP judges are going nowhere then. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #36
If this happens, we better have the House, Senate, and the Presidency. WordsMatter Feb 2019 #38
Well yes- that's the only way to fix the country. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #39
Ya I know... WordsMatter Feb 2019 #41
not a fan of that idea by any means Tiggeroshii Feb 2019 #42
I agree completely. And nice article! Very well-reasoned. DSV Feb 2019 #44
Cannot rec this enough kcr Feb 2019 #45
End the Senate, where before long 2/3 of the population will be represented by 1/3 of the Senate. Garrett78 Feb 2019 #46
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Ending the filibuster is ...»Reply #0