Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
12. Why were Rs able to take the Senate?
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 08:30 PM
Feb 2019

Do you not think that failure to deliver has consequences for a party over the long run? Did you miss the stunning collapse of the Democratic Party at the national, state and local level in the years following the wave elections of 2006 and 2008? Yes, an extraordinary man held the White House but what about the rest of it? Do you think that happened in a vacuum, or that it was just part of some natural cycle? If the answer is yes to either of those, why do you bother with politics at all?

Do you not get that the mantra "we can't do x because Rs will do it too" is a recipe for inaction, inertia and ultimate defeat? Have the Rs ever held back when they had the reins?* Did these last years have no lessons for you?

* and yes, I get it: they will do it again. Which is why we have to be equally bold, play offense just as hard and DELIVER! Seems to me we have been on our heels ever since the late 60s and jaysus H am I sick of it. Also too: it ain't working for SHIT. So, yeah, I don't see a benefit in doing the same shit on a different day and expecting different results.



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

loss of the judicial filibuster is why R's are stacking all the courts right now and for decades... hlthe2b Feb 2019 #1
If we had been willing to nuke shanny Feb 2019 #4
Exactly how, with R's holding Senate & refusing Garland a hearing or vote, might we have prevailed? hlthe2b Feb 2019 #6
Why were Rs able to take the Senate? shanny Feb 2019 #12
Gerrymandering for the House, Voter Suppression for Senate. Perhaps you might want to google that... hlthe2b Feb 2019 #18
Very helpful in Senate races and governorships. shanny Feb 2019 #20
oh honey shanny Feb 2019 #24
Oh, honey, you STILL haven't answered why exactly Merrick Garland would have been confirmed hlthe2b Feb 2019 #25
See! You can do offense! I'm proud of you. shanny Feb 2019 #26
meh... you are not worth my Friday evening... Knock yourself out. hlthe2b Feb 2019 #27
Yes- bold! Exactly. nm EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #23
Thank you! This is all well explained by Beutler in the article. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #8
Thank you too. shanny Feb 2019 #19
Sorry but this is naive: GOP was just waiting to nuke it EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #13
That is NOT what I asked. I asked you to address YOUR claim that we could have gotten Garland hlthe2b Feb 2019 #16
That wasn't me, and I asked you to address Gorsuch and Kavanaugh EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #21
Sorry but are you aware you are talking to-- shanny Feb 2019 #28
Your twin. hlthe2b Feb 2019 #30
Still waiting... Guess you don't actually have an answer to that, do you? hlthe2b Feb 2019 #22
I'm not convinced. That cuts both ways. mobeau69 Feb 2019 #2
Read this. The filibuster helps only Republicans at this time. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #10
I do not want the filibuster ended. Big Blue Marble Feb 2019 #3
Noooooooo!! Read the article! EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #9
When one party holds the House and Senate it is wasupaloopa Feb 2019 #5
I'm with her. shanny Feb 2019 #7
Keep the filibuster. CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #11
If you want Republicans to have control of America indefinitely, sure EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #15
Nah, I want to be able to stop them. CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #29
Really, read the article. Keeping the filibuster means submitting to minority GOP rule EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #34
I have a degree in political science. I think I know what a filibuster means. CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #35
Must end the filibuster if we want to avoid GOP control for decades. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #37
You certainly seem sure of yourself, but I'm not buying what you are selling. CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #40
Republicans want the filibuster: they know. Please read these articles. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #43
Nope. The filibuster is why we still have the ACA Recursion Feb 2019 #14
Nope. The filibuster is why the ACA has been unpopular and therefore vulnerable. shanny Feb 2019 #31
I agree with this. Volaris Feb 2019 #17
Well said. shanny Feb 2019 #32
If we don't remove the filibuster, 90%-95% of the Democratic agenda is DOA. LonePirate Feb 2019 #33
Right. And the GOP judges are going nowhere then. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #36
If this happens, we better have the House, Senate, and the Presidency. WordsMatter Feb 2019 #38
Well yes- that's the only way to fix the country. EndGOPPropaganda Feb 2019 #39
Ya I know... WordsMatter Feb 2019 #41
not a fan of that idea by any means Tiggeroshii Feb 2019 #42
I agree completely. And nice article! Very well-reasoned. DSV Feb 2019 #44
Cannot rec this enough kcr Feb 2019 #45
End the Senate, where before long 2/3 of the population will be represented by 1/3 of the Senate. Garrett78 Feb 2019 #46
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Ending the filibuster is ...»Reply #12