Bernie is coming to San Francisco Sunday

[ehrnst]

43. Isn't that changing the subject?

And attacking a straw man?

You are resonding to George and I, and continuing the rant at us for saying exactly the opposite of what we have actually said, because some people" are saying it, there is a demand for validation that it's "the subject" when actually, it's not what we said..

You even attacked me for not only supporting your claim with dates, even adding additional information concerning the full returns.

"Thank you," would be the appropriate response, not a demand that I apologize for anyone who didn't agree with you, and accusation (subject change, anyone?) that I was trying to create more smears by relaying the facts concerning charitable donations as per the WAPO update.

So why do you think that you continue refuse to admit that the people you are ranting at are not "changing the subject" when they are actually agreeing with you? Because you must always disagree with certain people on DU out of blind principle?

That sounds like someone so desperate to to be "the only voice of reason among those who lie" that they accuse others of 'changing the subject" when they aren't telling the lie that one wants to accuse them of.

straw man
/ˌstrô ˈman/
noun
1.
an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.

?resize=431%2C603

Or in some cases, when someone isn't arguing against one at all.