Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Ending the filibuster is critical. And only Liz Warren supports ending it. [View all]hlthe2b
(113,982 posts)30. Your twin.
You still have't answered so I figured your alter ego might. But I'll just leave you to talk with yourself.
the profoundly anti-democratic filibuster in 2009 we could have had a stimulus package appropriate for the size of the financial crisis, we could have had a much stronger ACA with a public option, we could have passed card check and the DREAM act, Obama could have had the appointments he wanted--including but not limited to Merrick Garland and a great number of other things (rescinding tax credits for fossil fuels would have been a major bonus in my view).
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ending the filibuster is critical. And only Liz Warren supports ending it. [View all]
EndGOPPropaganda
Feb 2019
OP
loss of the judicial filibuster is why R's are stacking all the courts right now and for decades...
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#1
Exactly how, with R's holding Senate & refusing Garland a hearing or vote, might we have prevailed?
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#6
Gerrymandering for the House, Voter Suppression for Senate. Perhaps you might want to google that...
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#18
Oh, honey, you STILL haven't answered why exactly Merrick Garland would have been confirmed
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#25
That is NOT what I asked. I asked you to address YOUR claim that we could have gotten Garland
hlthe2b
Feb 2019
#16
Really, read the article. Keeping the filibuster means submitting to minority GOP rule
EndGOPPropaganda
Feb 2019
#34
I have a degree in political science. I think I know what a filibuster means.
CrossingTheRubicon
Feb 2019
#35
You certainly seem sure of yourself, but I'm not buying what you are selling.
CrossingTheRubicon
Feb 2019
#40
Republicans want the filibuster: they know. Please read these articles.
EndGOPPropaganda
Feb 2019
#43
Nope. The filibuster is why the ACA has been unpopular and therefore vulnerable.
shanny
Feb 2019
#31