Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Pete Accused Of "Racist Paternalism" After Viral Essay Blasts 2011 Stance On Minority Education [View all]Celerity
(54,489 posts)25. was Harriot in the service of truth here? Michael Harriot : I'm Not With Her Because I'm Petty
https://www.theroot.com/i-m-not-with-her-because-i-m-petty-1790856224
snip
Ive always been this way. Whenever anyone does something objectionable to me or someone I love, I cant fk with them anymore. I cant place my arm around them and smile in photographs. I cant greet them with a Christian hug after church. I stay away from them forever. By default, I love everyone, but if I dont love you, I want to fight you. Forever. I can forgive you. I can forget you. But not both. Nowadays they call that petty, so I guess Im petty.
Thats why Im not with her.
Whenever I state this, troglodyte thinkers automatically assume that Im with Donald Trump. Ive written more scathing condemnations of Trump than I have of any other human being (except maybe Kanye West). There is a prevailing school of shallow thought that if youre not helping Hillary Clinton, you're helping Donald Trump. I am not that stupid. Thats not how math works. Thats not how the Electoral College works. But let me be clear: I am not with Donald Trump. I think he is a racist, entitled poster-boy-for-white-privilege half-wit capitalizing on white nationalism and Caucasian fear.
Is that clear enough for you?
I do not want Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump as president of the United States, but most of the people reading this already know the litany of reasons we should reject the thought of voting for Trump. Those people tell me they arent necessarily in love with Clinton, but they are faced with choosing the lesser of two evils.
Choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil. I will not choose evil.
snip
snip
Ive always been this way. Whenever anyone does something objectionable to me or someone I love, I cant fk with them anymore. I cant place my arm around them and smile in photographs. I cant greet them with a Christian hug after church. I stay away from them forever. By default, I love everyone, but if I dont love you, I want to fight you. Forever. I can forgive you. I can forget you. But not both. Nowadays they call that petty, so I guess Im petty.
Thats why Im not with her.
Whenever I state this, troglodyte thinkers automatically assume that Im with Donald Trump. Ive written more scathing condemnations of Trump than I have of any other human being (except maybe Kanye West). There is a prevailing school of shallow thought that if youre not helping Hillary Clinton, you're helping Donald Trump. I am not that stupid. Thats not how math works. Thats not how the Electoral College works. But let me be clear: I am not with Donald Trump. I think he is a racist, entitled poster-boy-for-white-privilege half-wit capitalizing on white nationalism and Caucasian fear.
Is that clear enough for you?
I do not want Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump as president of the United States, but most of the people reading this already know the litany of reasons we should reject the thought of voting for Trump. Those people tell me they arent necessarily in love with Clinton, but they are faced with choosing the lesser of two evils.
Choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil. I will not choose evil.
snip
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pete Accused Of "Racist Paternalism" After Viral Essay Blasts 2011 Stance On Minority Education [View all]
Hassin Bin Sober
Nov 2019
OP
Whatever the reason, if it results in lower turnout in the general, we have a major problem Nt
lostnfound
Nov 2019
#35
The author confuses the words imply and infer. It's a common but critical flaw in writing...
LanternWaste
Nov 2019
#2
no, but he is a bomb throwing sensationalist, here is his hit job on Biden as more proof
Celerity
Nov 2019
#22
was Harriot in the service of truth here? Michael Harriot : I'm Not With Her Because I'm Petty
Celerity
Nov 2019
#25
I guess you have no problem with white people excluding black people while discussing black issues.
BuffaloJackalope
Nov 2019
#27
no one is doing that now, that's pure rot, also read this (Buttigieg called Harriot and they talked)
Celerity
Nov 2019
#28
I take nothing you say seriously, you have posted multiple attacks on Buttigieg on multiple threads
Celerity
Nov 2019
#36
Thanks for clarifying. I didn't hear it that way at all. I understood it as a demographic point,
Alithea
Nov 2019
#23
Agreed. The mathematical correlation of income and educational attainment is
PatrickforO
Nov 2019
#40
Thanks for posting this. I wanted to post Harriot's essay but I can't afford hides rn.
WhiskeyGrinder
Nov 2019
#11
I'll bet money Mayor Pete will be POTUS or V-POTUS before Sen. Sanders is either.
AncientGeezer
Nov 2019
#38
PETE BUTTIGIEG FACES 'INSURMOUNTABLE ROADBLOCK' WITH MINORITY VOTERS, SAYS DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST
Gothmog
Nov 2019
#45
Oh, yes. Buttigieg should be exempt of any criticism by anyone for anything. /s
BuffaloJackalope
Nov 2019
#48
Except this isn't this week's new hit piece. Buttigieg has been failing at this issue for years.
BuffaloJackalope
Nov 2019
#51