Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

redqueen

(115,186 posts)
12. This comment is alarming.
Sat Dec 7, 2019, 10:40 AM
Dec 2019
"I think we should in fact be looking at what exists now and making a judgment whether or not the those in fact that are there, those wells that are there, whether or not they are dangerous, whether or not they have already done the damage,” Biden said.


Unbelievable. Maybe he should reach out to PSR if he's somehow still not aware of the facts.

This is a great example of the kind of 'we should look into that' political response that makes people hate and distrust politicians.

A NEW FRACKING LANDSCAPE: REPORT ON RECENT SCIENCE SHOWS OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF HARM
03/13/2018

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL GROUPS RAISE ALARM THAT BUILD-OUT OF DRILLING AND FRACKING OPERATIONS IS CREATING A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS. EXPERTS AVAILABLE FOR INTERVIEWS.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Elana Simon, Communications Manager, Physicians for Social Responsibility
esimon@psr.org, 202-681-9169

As incontrovertible evidence of harm from fracking mounts and more health professionals raise the alarm, the fracking debate is taking place within an altered landscape. Today, as a growing body of scientific evidence confirms demonstrable health risks and harms from drilling and fracking operations and their attendant infrastructure, calls from the medical community for health-protective policies are growing louder. A new report by two leading health professional organizations—Physicians for Social Responsibility and Concerned Health Professionals of New York—tracks and analyzes the rapidly emerging science that points to the increasing dangers to health, including respiratory disease, cancer risk, and low birth weight and preterm birth, both of which are leading causes of infant death.

This evidence is of grave concern to health professionals, especially given that over 17 million Americans now live within a mile of an active oil or gas well. This population includes over a million young children and a million elderly people, two groups with special vulnerabilities to air pollution and contaminated water. Other studies show harm to infants born to mothers who live near drilling and fracking operations during their pregnancies. If carried out, the Trump administration’s plans to roll back federal regulations and expand fracking on public lands will further exacerbate these harmful impacts.

The new report, the Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms of Fracking, 5th Edition compiles and summarizes an avalanche of recent studies. Of more than 1,300 studies published on the effects of drilling and fracking, more than 90 percent have been published since 2013, and about a quarter were published in 2017 alone.

Several experts are available, upon request, for interviews about the new report and the issue more broadly.

...
https://www.psr.org/blog/2018/03/13/a-new-fracking-landscape-report-on-recent-science-shows-overwhelming-evidence-of-harm/
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Warren's stance? Since my 1st choice suspended her campaign, I'm going with Warren. Thanks for p RestoreAmerica2020 Dec 2019 #1
Biden explains why he doesn't support a nationwide fracking ban (September 4, 2019) Scurrilous Dec 2019 #2
This comment is alarming. redqueen Dec 2019 #12
If he's not aware of the facts he didn't pay attention. The harm fracking does has been proven Autumn Dec 2019 #21
No, the greed-extraction-profit at any cost paradigm is a fucking clown show. Deplete and destroy Magoo48 Dec 2019 #34
😵 Duppers Dec 2019 #3
The problem is Joe sets the bar to low. brutus smith Dec 2019 #4
And some people promise pie in the sky. Scurrilous Dec 2019 #5
Boom! oldsoftie Dec 2019 #11
What is "Boom"? Magoo48 Dec 2019 #29
Illogical. Setting sights high is exactly the way to make urgently needed progress. JudyM Dec 2019 #17
+++ still_one Dec 2019 #26
Is it pie-in-sky to want a clean, livable environment? Magoo48 Dec 2019 #28
Agreed Sherman A1 Dec 2019 #6
Thanks for the update. BannonsLiver Dec 2019 #7
Thanks Joe. Just like other bad things, you go with Laura PourMeADrink Dec 2019 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author redqueen Dec 2019 #23
Incremental is code for status quo, greenwash, do nothing. Corporate voodoo. Magoo48 Dec 2019 #30
"incremental" is NOT "status quo". One is movement, the other is stagnation. oldsoftie Dec 2019 #36
No, it's code for getting rid of a monster Laura PourMeADrink Dec 2019 #39
Your 'news' source is FAR left left-of-center2012 Dec 2019 #9
So centrists are the least biased. MarcA Dec 2019 #20
Thank You. Where is Joe in relation to other candidates. He's not in the center. Magoo48 Dec 2019 #31
Glad you hold Joe's advice in high regard. beastie boy Dec 2019 #10
For those of us concerned about the environment this is disqualifying. Joe941 Dec 2019 #13
You oppose Biden's view that we need to transistion away from fracking? Kaleva Dec 2019 #14
So you are not voting for Biden if he is the nominee, right? beastie boy Dec 2019 #16
I'm talking about the primaries not the general. Joe941 Dec 2019 #18
So let me get this straight: Biden's position on fracking is disqualifying in the primaries but beastie boy Dec 2019 #22
Correct. You got it. Joe941 Dec 2019 #24
Got it. He is fit to run in Generals but not fit to run in Primaries. beastie boy Dec 2019 #25
Yes, for anyone aware of the immediacy of Climate Catastrophe. Magoo48 Dec 2019 #32
Western countries have all reduced emissions since 2000. China & India have increased over 100% oldsoftie Dec 2019 #37
Without support from both chambers of Congress, I don't think any president can ban fracking... Kaleva Dec 2019 #15
It would be nice tho to have support from the top. Magoo48 Dec 2019 #33
You have to do what you can do and NOW not just spout pretty plans and ideas Peacetrain Dec 2019 #19
I see us winning both the White House and the Senate. Magoo48 Dec 2019 #35
"Fracking is absolutely devastating wherever it exists" I live in Belmont doc03 Dec 2019 #27
From the comments section - a ray of sunshine bursts through the clouds. Scurrilous Dec 2019 #38
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»I have another primary ca...»Reply #12