Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: The Erasure of Black Women Continues: Let's talk about Misogynoir [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)92. "inventing falsehoods" So you're calling me a liar.
I must have REALLY hit the nail on the head. Projection?
I never said I expected "expected POC to fall in behind her, because, you know." That's your invention. It is a personal attack and it is unwarranted. Is this what you do when people disagree with you? Invent falsehoods and imply they are like right-wingers?
You've made that the basis for your argument that she was a weak candidate: "the black community wasn't getting behind her." So yes, you, as you say "suggested that."
That not right.
It is but not because of the reason you gave...
Kamala Harris was at 3% support when she dropped out. You blame that on rampant racist-sexism in the Democratic Party.
You invented that falsehood - also known as attacking a strawman. Legions of them now.
I call bullshit on that lie.
You invented that out of whole cloth.
I don't understand what your deal is. Seems weird, man. Really weird.
Back at ya!
The Democratic Party values diversity.
Another copy and paste reply that substitutes for a response, and somehow you seem to think that by simply repeating it, it makes your positions more valid.
Kamala Harris had tremendous goodwill when she entered the race. She was top-tier. A definite contender. She squandered that by running a bad campaign. That's the reason she's out.
No, misogynoir also played a part, adding stressors to her campaign, causing her to have to veer off from her message to deal with the issues that WOC deal with that other candidate who are white males do not.
Here is some information for you on that. You're welcome.
https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2019/03/226449/kamala-harris-personal-connection-campaign-sexist-criticism
https://www.thenation.com/article/kamala-harris-willie-brown/
https://www.salon.com/2019/05/02/how-misogyny-and-sexism-are-already-shaping-the-2020-race_partner/
https://www.mediamatters.org/maga-trolls/sexist-right-wing-smear-against-kamala-harris-moves-fever-swamps-fox
https://medium.com/@kitanyaharrison/what-does-being-black-enough-mean-for-kamala-harris-da38b2d1fdd0
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The false narrritive only stands if one buys that Democratic voters are
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#21
Actually suggesting that racist-sexism is pervasive in the Democratic party
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#144
"Liberal Democrats are more than ready to support a woman of color for president"
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#30
Strange premise. Maxine Waters is the only one on that list with legitimate grievance.
tritsofme
Dec 2019
#17
Who claimed she was "somehow entitled to the nomination"? I haven't seen anyone here do that
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#48
You may not realize it from your bubble, but that is how the argument sounds to many of us.
tritsofme
Dec 2019
#132
When one actually doesn't want to respond, one doesn't respond that one is not going to respond...
ehrnst
Dec 2019
#155
Thanks for your response to my response to your "not going to respond" response.
ehrnst
Dec 2019
#157
Nonsense. You are accusing Democratic voters--including ones that supported Harris
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#38
You seem to be blurring the Democratic Party ideals and platform with individual Democrats
ehrnst
Dec 2019
#71
Strawman.... no one said that bigotry is the driving force of today's Democrats.
ehrnst
Dec 2019
#75
No. You pointed out something that isn't true (for the second time) and its not something...
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#88
I never said the thing you claimed I said. You invented them. Call that what you will.
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#94
Yes, they can see what I wrote and what you claimed I wrote. And how they don't match.
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#99
Your questions are not the same as the claims being made about misogynoir.
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#52
No...it was her time as AG and DA that hurt her with AA votes...it wasn't white voters that had her
Demsrule86
Dec 2019
#151
Suppose Harris had made it through December and failed to make the debate in January...
brooklynite
Dec 2019
#46
...and one can discuss the facts of racism and sexism without tying them to one candidate...
brooklynite
Dec 2019
#50
We can talk about racism and sexism but not about individuals who are affected by them?
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#53
No. What you don't seem to understand is that modern Democrats understand the lessons of history
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#60
So Democratic Party loyalists are now responsible for the abberent behavior of the far-leftists
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#62
No. The false narrative suggests that racist-sexism among Democratic voters
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#70
As someone who likes Kamala Harris--as I do as well--did you have moments during this campaign
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#86
She was indeed being advised incorrectly by people within her campaign & it was a poorly run one
Pachamama
Dec 2019
#95
At that moment in the debate I turned to my wife--who also like Kamala Harris--and I said she's just
The Valley Below
Dec 2019
#97