Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Don't practically all the criticisms against M4All also apply to the public option? [View all]ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)18. No
And here I want to add my obligatory no universal healthcare plan is complete without addressing where healthcare will be provided and who is going to be providing it.
We are drowning. The nursing shortage is now. The provider shortage is here. Clinics and hospitals are closing. Or consolidating under single large entities in metropolitan areas.
If youre in a rural area its worse. Some healthcare is done remotely, not bad of itself, as technology advances but whats driving this is very bad. There are complex Med surg floors where nurses have five patients. ICUs where nurses are completely understaffed and overwhelmed
I want to see the plans for this.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Don't practically all the criticisms against M4All also apply to the public option? [View all]
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2019
OP
But ironically, people today get forced off their current employer-based insurance all the time.
thesquanderer
Dec 2019
#32
Warren doesn't think so. That's why she's now saying to START with the public option.
pnwmom
Dec 2019
#8
Individuals with the means to do so will buy into a public option, if they so choose.
OilemFirchen
Dec 2019
#9
Such sliding scale premiums aren't enough to fund Medicare, it will have to also involve...
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2019
#13
I don't see how a public option would be immune to any of those problems you mentioned. n/t
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2019
#14
I don't think that the public option would necessarily be immune to some of the problems of M4A,
TexasTowelie
Dec 2019
#19
re: "M4A...would create a monopoly in healthcare and like all monopolies, costs rise"
thesquanderer
Dec 2019
#33
No. Public option can be added to existing laws, no new legislation needed!
beastie boy
Dec 2019
#15
To create a public option? Is there a part of the ACA that allows for a public option to be created?
TCJ70
Dec 2019
#29
As the paragraph you erxcerpted from indicates, state-based public option already exists.
beastie boy
Dec 2019
#42
Sorry. Thought you were the same as the beginning of this subthread. My bad.
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2019
#55
No...M4A ends private insurance...I am absolutely against this...as we will be tossed out of office
Demsrule86
Dec 2019
#25
There's plenty of non-profit insurance available now. It's not noticeably better
Recursion
Dec 2019
#51