Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Don't practically all the criticisms against M4All also apply to the public option? [View all]Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)53. Only private insurance that overlaps coverage.
But again, how many people actually 'like' their private insurance provider? I don't know a single person who enjoys the endless hassle of denial of coverage, the mountain of paperwork, the mystery bills, the out of network nonsense, the deductibles, the co-pays, any of it. What I have heard is people confused that their doctors are somehow tied to their insurance plan and if the insurance plan goes away their doctors go away. That is because the HIC and its agents and useful idiots keep regurgitating the talking point that we loves us our private insurance plans.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Don't practically all the criticisms against M4All also apply to the public option? [View all]
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2019
OP
But ironically, people today get forced off their current employer-based insurance all the time.
thesquanderer
Dec 2019
#32
Warren doesn't think so. That's why she's now saying to START with the public option.
pnwmom
Dec 2019
#8
Individuals with the means to do so will buy into a public option, if they so choose.
OilemFirchen
Dec 2019
#9
Such sliding scale premiums aren't enough to fund Medicare, it will have to also involve...
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2019
#13
I don't see how a public option would be immune to any of those problems you mentioned. n/t
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2019
#14
I don't think that the public option would necessarily be immune to some of the problems of M4A,
TexasTowelie
Dec 2019
#19
re: "M4A...would create a monopoly in healthcare and like all monopolies, costs rise"
thesquanderer
Dec 2019
#33
No. Public option can be added to existing laws, no new legislation needed!
beastie boy
Dec 2019
#15
To create a public option? Is there a part of the ACA that allows for a public option to be created?
TCJ70
Dec 2019
#29
As the paragraph you erxcerpted from indicates, state-based public option already exists.
beastie boy
Dec 2019
#42
Sorry. Thought you were the same as the beginning of this subthread. My bad.
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2019
#55
No...M4A ends private insurance...I am absolutely against this...as we will be tossed out of office
Demsrule86
Dec 2019
#25
There's plenty of non-profit insurance available now. It's not noticeably better
Recursion
Dec 2019
#51