Gosh at least don't wuss out on an article you're bringing into a thread that's remotely positive about Biden. You're the one who took the time to come in here, decide it was very important to tear Biden down in a thread that wasn't attacking any other candidate and focusing solely on that of Biden's comeback, by hunting for an opinion piece that mistakes opinion as fact.
You then, like the writer of this article you so very kindly remind us you're not trying to promote, do the same by stating the GOP wants to run against Biden, again with no evidence of this supposed fact.
The article you're not promoting so happens to say it's a myth that he'd beat Trump. We're told he'd be crushed in this article you're not promoting. Okay. Show me the polls that prove this is a myth? Oh wait. The writer in this article you are not promoting can't because that contradicts his point...which is completely built out of the idea that because Hillary lost, then that means so will Biden.
Except that doesn't pass the reality test since, you know, Biden does better than any Democrat head-to-head against Trump. Gosh, it's almost like Biden isn't Hillary!
Hell, one could be as stupid as the writer is and assume that, because Obama is literally the only Democrat to win the White House in nearly 25 years, that the Democrats' only hope is to nominate a non-white candidate, as a white candidate nominee has now lost each of the last three elections they ran. It would make as much sense as the reasoning we're seeing here in the article you're not promoting.
But hey, screw the reality that tells us one thing. That's a myth! Sure sounds a lot like those who are telling us to reject science and disbelieve what's happening to the climate right before our eyes.
Cool. Well I'm glad you're not here promoting this article, tho!