Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Some history concerning the Socialist Workers Party, The Iran Hostage crisis, and Bernie Sanders [View all]
From the Daily Beast:
In 1977, [Bernie Sanders] left the tiny left-wing Liberty Union Party of Vermont that hed co-founded, and in 1980 instead aligned himself with the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), the self-proclaimed Trotskyist revolutionary party, became its presidential elector in Vermont, and campaigned for its candidates and platform that defended the Iranian hostage seizure.
..........................................................................
In fact, the SWPs position on Iran is part of what distinguishes it from democratic socialist groups. When its presidential candidate, Andrew Pulley, came to speak at the University of Vermont in October 1980, Sanders chaired the meeting. Pulley attracted only 40 students to his rally, where he concentrated, according to the SWPs newspaper The Militant, on the Iran-Iraq war, and condemned anti-Iranian hysteria around the U.S. hostages. Military action against Iran was not at that point theoreticalPulleys speech came six months after the attempt to free the hostages in Operation Eagle Claw had failed.
.........................................
Asked about the SWP in 1988, Sanders, then the mayor of Burlington and a congressional candidate, talked down the connection, saying that: I was asked to put my name on the ballot and I did, thats true." Today, no mention of Sanders association with the SWP appears in any campaign biography he has issued. But Sanders remained tied to the party after 1980. He was a featured speaker at a Boston rally for the SWPs Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate and the partys slate for Congress in 1982, the year after he was narrowly elected mayor of Burlington. In 1984, he again spoke on behalf of the SWPs presidential candidate, this time former Black Panther Mel Mason, telling The Militant that at a time when the Democratic and Republican parties are intellectually and spiritually bankrupt, it is imperative for radical voices to be heard which offer fundamental alternatives to capitalist ideology." It remains unclear when Sanderss affiliation with the SWP ended.
..........................................................................
In fact, the SWPs position on Iran is part of what distinguishes it from democratic socialist groups. When its presidential candidate, Andrew Pulley, came to speak at the University of Vermont in October 1980, Sanders chaired the meeting. Pulley attracted only 40 students to his rally, where he concentrated, according to the SWPs newspaper The Militant, on the Iran-Iraq war, and condemned anti-Iranian hysteria around the U.S. hostages. Military action against Iran was not at that point theoreticalPulleys speech came six months after the attempt to free the hostages in Operation Eagle Claw had failed.
.........................................
Asked about the SWP in 1988, Sanders, then the mayor of Burlington and a congressional candidate, talked down the connection, saying that: I was asked to put my name on the ballot and I did, thats true." Today, no mention of Sanders association with the SWP appears in any campaign biography he has issued. But Sanders remained tied to the party after 1980. He was a featured speaker at a Boston rally for the SWPs Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate and the partys slate for Congress in 1982, the year after he was narrowly elected mayor of Burlington. In 1984, he again spoke on behalf of the SWPs presidential candidate, this time former Black Panther Mel Mason, telling The Militant that at a time when the Democratic and Republican parties are intellectually and spiritually bankrupt, it is imperative for radical voices to be heard which offer fundamental alternatives to capitalist ideology." It remains unclear when Sanderss affiliation with the SWP ended.
https://news.yahoo.com/iran-took-americans-hostage-bernie-100052053.html
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some history concerning the Socialist Workers Party, The Iran Hostage crisis, and Bernie Sanders [View all]
ehrnst
Jan 2020
OP
Yes, that very one that is apparently the one true measure of progressive activism
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#108
"Today, no mention of Sanders' association with the SWP appears in any campaign biography ..."
left-of-center2012
Jan 2020
#7
Whataboutism. He was a SWP far longer than his temporary affiliations with the Democratic Party.
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#11
He didn't vote with the Democratic Party once between Jun 28 last year and Jan 6...
George II
Jan 2020
#21
Look at the bigger time frame. He's been in congress 30 years and you're talking about 6 months.
thesquanderer
Jan 2020
#30
My point is that he's getting "credit" for not voting with trump when the reason he didn't is...
George II
Jan 2020
#41
I don't know, but still that wouldn't be factored into 538's "trump score". They use official votes.
George II
Jan 2020
#50
re: "You were the one who brought party affiliation into the discussion..."
thesquanderer
Jan 2020
#45
My mistake - you were jumping to the defense of someone that brought Party affiliation into this
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#55
re: McCain vote to preserve ACA did not indicate that he served even at that moment as a Democrat.
thesquanderer
Jan 2020
#155
Interesting analogy. Are Jews for Jesus Jewish? Christian? Can they be both?
thesquanderer
Jan 2020
#159
Wow! We have Sanders people beating on Senator Warren because she was once a Republican.
NNadir
Jan 2020
#61
Bernie touts his college civil rights activities, and participating in the March on Washington
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#27
Any post that is negative about a current candidate is divisive. how about something positive about
tiredtoo
Jan 2020
#65
Republicans are going to use my posts as "fodder?" And you want to ban such posts on DU?
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#69
No, I'm not stretching anything. I'm explaining why your post appears to be a complaint.
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#106
They don't want to push this now because they want to push it in a General Election
Zolorp
Jan 2020
#104
Campaigns don't work that way. We need to know about the candidate, good and bad.
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#109
You're going to change your candidate preference because someone posted some historical
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#39
They exist - here's a link to a negative Biden thread, so you can start scolding people for
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#141
Ronald Radosh is not a "right winger". Read about his entire history of who he worked with, for....
George II
Jan 2020
#48
From a man who joined the Army as a 17 year old kid in Oct., '80, this is incredibly relevant.
Zolorp
Jan 2020
#31
The Socialist Workers Party is a communist party. Now Sander tries to hide or minimize
The Valley Below
Jan 2020
#47
It's not good optics. I imagine that's why he excludes it from his bio, even as he
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#57
He hasn't been scared enough to bribe a whole country to make up lies about Bernie.
MrsCoffee
Jan 2020
#117
I suggest DUers do some research on Andrew Pulley to see just how extremist he was.
highplainsdem
Jan 2020
#119
Yep... DURING the general election, it will be MUCH TOO LATE to try and redefine "socialism"...
NurseJackie
Jan 2020
#154