Democratic Primaries

OliverQ

(3,363 posts)

40. Tulsi also has to prove that the defamation harmed her in some way.

Wed Jan 22, 2020, 07:48 PM

Jan 2020

Seeing as some people defended her, and she probably got Republican donor cash, and she went on Carlson and Hannity, I see no evidence that comment caused any actual harm. Therefore, her defamation suit is meaningless.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tulsi Gabbard Sues Hillary Clinton [View all] wyldwolf Jan 2020 OP

Tulsi really wants to be sanders' VP Gothmog Jan 2020 #1

Which is exactly why I'm not supporting Bernie for Pres. woodsprite Jan 2020 #29

This should be very entertaining. comradebillyboy Jan 2020 #2

She never said her name JustAnotherGen Jan 2020 #3

Good point ! Gabbard clearly saw herself in that comment donkeypoofed Jan 2020 #36

Tulsi needs to swim waaaayyyy out into the Pacific. NoMoreRepugs Jan 2020 #4

"Next up on Fox: Rep Tulsi Gabbard tells us about her lawsuit against the Evil Hillary Clinton." BuffaloJackalope Jan 2020 #5

Question: Does she STILL have DUers supporting her? hlthe2b Jan 2020 #6

Yes n/t Devil Child Jan 2020 #8

Yes, indeed. David__77 Jan 2020 #35

Unfortunately. bearsfootball516 Jan 2020 #14

Good n/t Devil Child Jan 2020 #7

gabbard. "look at meeeeeee".. Cha Jan 2020 #30

This news is all over the media... at140 Jan 2020 #9

One of Pierce Bainbridge's Clients -- Rudy Giuliani (The attorneys for Trump's attorney!) TheBlackAdder Jan 2020 #44

LOL W_HAMILTON Jan 2020 #10

Well Putin always wanted to destroy Hillary so Tulsi must keep her boss happy nini Jan 2020 #11

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2020 #12

Hillary never mentioned Tulsi's name, so she has no grounds to sue. OliverQ Jan 2020 #13

Well, that's not completely true, because if you can prove a person was clearly talking about you, LongtimeAZDem Jan 2020 #15

Yes...it is the use of the term "asset" (NOT "AGENT" ) that renders this absolutely moot. hlthe2b Jan 2020 #22

Tulsi also has to prove that the defamation harmed her in some way. OliverQ Jan 2020 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author LongtimeAZDem Jan 2020 #42

A spokesman confirmed it Shrek Jan 2020 #38

If anyone wants to read Gabbard's complaint, here's a link onenote Jan 2020 #16

Interesting law firm representing Gabbard onenote Jan 2020 #17

Hmm. Since even a simple google search would reveal those problems, perhaps Gabbard's hlthe2b Jan 2020 #23

Guess a significant contingent fee arrangement. onenote Jan 2020 #25

Guess you're not qualified to run then Tulsi. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2020 #18

Bring it on, but don't expect to get a settlement payout. oasis Jan 2020 #19

Tulsi will lose this lawsuit Renew Deal Jan 2020 #20

Haven't we seen cases where it was important to announce doing something, rather than actually doing OnDoutside Jan 2020 #28

K&R RandiFan1290 Jan 2020 #21

gabbard.. "look at meeeeeeee".. Cha Jan 2020 #32

LOOK AT ME!!! StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #24

That's what I said... Cha Jan 2020 #33

Following orders, she is. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2020 #26

Can't wait for the discovery dlk Jan 2020 #27

It won't jberryhill Jan 2020 #34

I imagine it will be dismissed dlk Jan 2020 #39

She's trying to keep her 15-min of fame going and to keep Hillary Clinton in a bad light. woodsprite Jan 2020 #31

. Tiggeroshii Jan 2020 #37

$50 million dollars? What a freaking grifter! ecstatic Jan 2020 #41

Talk about a frivolous lawsuit! BlueMTexpat Jan 2020 #43

About time. Good luck Tulsi! floppyboo Jan 2020 #45

No puppet. No puppet. You're the puppet! betsuni Jan 2020 #46

This woman lets Tulsi have it Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2020 #47