Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Sanders' Social Security 'adjustments' undercut Biden attack [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)10. LOL. 'No one's going to believe' Bernie's own words on the subject?
Since you may have avoided reading the OP after seeing the headline:
At the time, the primary legislative fixes to Social Security financing had increased taxes and cut benefits. That includes a major 1983 bill signed into law by Reagan that came as the program was on the brink of insolvency. It raised taxes on working families, froze benefit increases for six months and gradually raised the age at which retirees can receive full benefits from 65 to 67.
During a 1999 press conference, Sanders went further, praising the 1983 law as a good example of people coming together to enact a solution without draconian changes.
We should remember that in 1982, Social Security was within a few months a few months of not being able to pay out all benefits owed to Americans, Sanders said at the time. And then people came together and said of course we want to save Social Security. They worked together, and they did.
.............................................
Sanders said during his 1996 campaign that the Social Security system had been adjusted before, and adjustments will have to be made again. He declined to say at the time what adjustments he supported.
During a 1999 press conference, Sanders went further, praising the 1983 law as a good example of people coming together to enact a solution without draconian changes.
We should remember that in 1982, Social Security was within a few months a few months of not being able to pay out all benefits owed to Americans, Sanders said at the time. And then people came together and said of course we want to save Social Security. They worked together, and they did.
.............................................
Sanders said during his 1996 campaign that the Social Security system had been adjusted before, and adjustments will have to be made again. He declined to say at the time what adjustments he supported.
https://apnews.com/31c432f20acba807a569c7004abaf473
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh did you notice 538 adjusted their numbers in the forecast there was a "small' error
Demsrule86
Jan 2020
#7
LOL. Like I said, nobody is going to believe that Bernie actually wants to cut Social Security.
DanTex
Jan 2020
#6
Hey Mikey! Magical thinking and saying "Fuck the polls" is so totally gonna get the job done!
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#14
No there is plenty left for two general elections...but I don't think Sander need worry about a
Demsrule86
Jan 2020
#20
This is the first I am hearing about this...thank you for posting...and I sincerely think that
Demsrule86
Jan 2020
#18
There are many who would like the free press not to look too closely at certain candidates.
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#21
Well, Biden is on video bragging about seeking a freeze, and supported the Obama
DanTex
Jan 2020
#16
So according to rose twitter standards, Bernie Sanders wants to cut social security
Cha
Jan 2020
#27
And it is probably true although, times were desperate...but no one is going to believe Biden wanted
Demsrule86
Jan 2020
#15
I guess we'll see. He supported Obama's proposed SS cuts, but yeah, maybe some people will just
DanTex
Jan 2020
#17
Ironic you're going with the attack line rather than a rational reponse...
LanternWaste
Jan 2020
#23