Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

underpants

(196,609 posts)

22. Breaking!

Reply to MineralMan (Original post)

Mon Feb 3, 2020, 01:02 PM

Feb 2020

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287468129

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No more Iowa polls. That's over. [View all] MineralMan Feb 2020 OP

one more poll.... getagrip_already Feb 2020 #1

This!! Thekaspervote Feb 2020 #2

Yes, the only decisive one, too. MineralMan Feb 2020 #5

unfortunately, given the new mechanics of reporting.... getagrip_already Feb 2020 #8

"They are a time to yell at your neighbors, coworkers, employees,, and family while bullying them. . rsdsharp Feb 2020 #24

I've seen it pandr32 Feb 2020 #26

May I ask where in Iowa the occurred? rsdsharp Feb 2020 #28

Washington State ahead of the 2016 election pandr32 Feb 2020 #29

I'm sorry about you experience in Washington. rsdsharp Feb 2020 #31

I sure hope it doesn't happen there pandr32 Feb 2020 #33

Lowering expectations again? bluewater Feb 2020 #3

it's NEVER been important to a frontrunner... getagrip_already Feb 2020 #4

Cherry picking? Seems so. bluewater Feb 2020 #7

actually, it proves my point... getagrip_already Feb 2020 #10

Actually, it does not. bluewater Feb 2020 #16

I feel like I'm talking to trump... ;) getagrip_already Feb 2020 #17

Your argument is simply flawed and based on cherry picking examples. bluewater Feb 2020 #21

Thanks for this Dave in VA Feb 2020 #11

Didn't batshit crazy Michelle Bachman once win one of these? happybird Feb 2020 #30

Not at all. I've been saying that the Iowa caucuses are meaningless MineralMan Feb 2020 #6

Using your logic, no individual state matters much then. bluewater Feb 2020 #12

Yes, well...who got Iowa's electors in 2016? MineralMan Feb 2020 #15

"Iowa's interesting, but not really very important at all..." myohmy2 Feb 2020 #9

Not at all. As I said, even if the candidate I support gets the most MineralMan Feb 2020 #13

not at all, just realistic... getagrip_already Feb 2020 #14

Obama. AtheistCrusader Feb 2020 #18

apologies... fixed... learning disability. ;) n/t getagrip_already Feb 2020 #19

No worries. AtheistCrusader Feb 2020 #20

Breaking! underpants Feb 2020 #22

They muffed the last one. RhodeIslandOne Feb 2020 #23

Um, not quite. 538 just added two results from a new Iowa poll. The primary results have Buttigieg highplainsdem Feb 2020 #25

Groan bluewater Feb 2020 #27

"Iowa's interesting, but not really very important at all, in the race to the nomination." Progress_Dem Feb 2020 #32