Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
88. You mean this one?
Mon Feb 3, 2020, 02:31 PM
Feb 2020
Mike’s Plan:

Raise rates for high-income taxpayers


The 2017 tax reform gave most of its benefits to the rich. In other words, instead of working to reduce inequality, Trump is making it worse. Mike sees growing inequality as a threat to all Americans. It is unacceptable. He will dedicate his administration to turning this dangerous trend around.

Reverse the Trump tax changes for high-income households, restoring the top rate on ordinary income from 37% to 39.6%.

Tax capital income more equitably

One of the biggest defects in our tax system is the way we tax capital gains for high-income taxpayers. Mike will ensure that wealthy owners of capital are taxed on equal terms with workers.

Tax capital gains at the same rate as ordinary income for taxpayers above $1 million. Taxes won’t rise on the savings of ordinary taxpayers.

Strong new measures to curb avoidance and deferral for the wealthiest Americans.

Impose a new tax on the very rich

Getting taxes on capital and taxes on income from employment on an equal footing is essential – but not enough to pay for vital investments. Mike will ask the wealthiest to make an additional contribution toward paying for necessary improvements in infrastructure, education, health care and more.

A 5% surtax on incomes above $5 million a year.
Will apply to income from capital and labor.
Will affect less than 0.1% of taxpayers.

Reform the estate tax

In the U.S., only very large estates are liable to face tax, and owners of the biggest estates are expert at gaming the system to reduce what they owe. One of the most egregious loopholes is “stepped-up basis at death,” which erases taxes due on trillions of dollars in capital gains – allowing enormous wealth to move virtually untaxed from generation to generation. Under Mike’s leadership, all this will change.

Lower the estate-tax threshold, so that more estates are taxed. This plan will protect family owned farms and small businesses. Estates liable to pay tax will still be less than 1% of the total.
End stepped-up basis for unrealized capital gains at death.
Shut down multiple estate-tax avoidance schemes.

Close loopholes

The U.S. tax system is full of complexities that could have been designed – and in many cases were designed – purely to give high-income taxpayers ways of paying less. This is deeply unfair to the ordinary working families that pay every cent of what’s owed, and lack the means to find and use these loopholes. Mike will work for a thorough simplification of the system, so that tax preferences serving no good purpose are purged. For example, he will:

Close the “pass-through” 20% deduction that lets many rich taxpayers pay less.
End the “like-kind” provision that lets real-estate investors defer tax indefinitely.
End the carried-interest loophole.
Move firmly to shut down other tax-avoidance strategies.

Make businesses pay their fair share

Trump’s tax reform cut business taxes too much – giving U.S. businesses a bigger tax cut than they had even asked for. While our tax code needs to ensure that our producers stay competitive with foreign companies, they can and should contribute more. We also need smarter and more effective measures to prevent companies using financial engineering to shift reported profits to foreign tax havens.

Raise the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%.
Raise the minimum tax on foreign income and apply it on a per-country not global basis.
Tighten rules on transfer pricing and reporting of foreign taxes.
Apply pressure to countries that set up as tax havens.
Take the lead on cooperative international efforts to defeat profit-shifting.

Equip the IRS

The agency’s systems are out of date. IRS staffing has been cut by a third since 2010. The rate of audit of high-income households has fallen by almost half. This decline in IRS capacity has worsened under Trump, and the message has gone out to tax cheats: Don’t worry about getting caught. The so-called tax gap – the difference between what’s owed and what’s actually collected – stands at roughly $6 trillion to $8 trillion over ten years. An IRS equipped to do its job could cut that gap substantially.

Reverse Trump’s efforts to cripple the agency and give it the resources it needs to do its job.
Collect many hundreds of billions in taxes owed but never paid.
These and other reforms will raise approximately $5 trillion over ten years.

https://www.mikebloomberg.com/policies/tax-policy
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'll bet that 99% of the people on this site are unfamiliar with the political climate in NYC... George II Feb 2020 #1
If he wins the nomination, I won't have to hold my nose to vote for him. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #2
Bloomberg seems immune to comprehension of small businesses and renting masses DemocracyMouse Feb 2020 #15
What policies were those? N/T lapucelle Feb 2020 #30
+1 InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2020 #35
"like Native Americans pushed west by European conquerors" TwilightZone Feb 2020 #54
Nor will I. calimary Feb 2020 #43
So you speak for all New Yorkers? melman Feb 2020 #3
I think there are about eight million people who would disagree that NYC is ruined. George II Feb 2020 #5
I think you're wrong melman Feb 2020 #7
"many people that lament what New York has become" left-of-center2012 Feb 2020 #9
Yes melman Feb 2020 #12
Ah, Jeremiah Moss, aka Griffin Hansbury. Yeah. George II Feb 2020 #19
He doesn't have the energy to explain NY to you George. lapucelle Feb 2020 #41
The last thing I need is for someone to explain NY to me. George II Feb 2020 #50
Those of us who have spent our lives here don't need you to 'splain the city to us. N/T lapucelle Feb 2020 #39
As a NY'er who spends a large amount of time in the City each yr..(for decades) AncientGeezer Feb 2020 #87
I'm going to jump in here and NellieStarbuck Feb 2020 #14
Post removed Post removed Feb 2020 #18
"Banana Republic operators"? George II Feb 2020 #20
I've been hear my whole life, and I've had the panorama. The city is not nearly ruined, lapucelle Feb 2020 #36
At a 87.2% higher cost of living than in average America Farmer-Rick Feb 2020 #52
Um hmmm.... George II Feb 2020 #17
What are you talking about? N/T lapucelle Feb 2020 #32
Do I speak for ALL New yorkers? No, I talk about political reality... brooklynite Feb 2020 #6
How about you don't put words in my mouth, okay? melman Feb 2020 #8
why am I supporting Pete? Because I think he's the best candidate. brooklynite Feb 2020 #23
NYC is culturally in decline. Money has driven out both DemocracyMouse Feb 2020 #16
No it's not and no it isn't. N/T lapucelle Feb 2020 #33
That's the most ridiculous thing I've read in a while Recursion Feb 2020 #47
Bloomberg has been a Democrat a lot longer than Sanders NYMinute Feb 2020 #4
Good one...😁 pangaia Feb 2020 #13
Real Democrats don't give money to Scott Brown, Pat Toomey, the NY State Senate Republicans liskddksil Feb 2020 #25
Anyting to defend Bernie hahahahahahaha NYMinute Feb 2020 #46
Who said I'm supporting Bernie. I'm probably supporting Biden who liskddksil Feb 2020 #60
hmmmmmm NYMinute Feb 2020 #118
... MontanaMama Feb 2020 #27
People tend to think the "average Democrat" is just like them. DanTex Feb 2020 #10
In which case, "a lot of Democrats" won't vote for him... brooklynite Feb 2020 #24
Yeah $200M of ad buys will do that. DanTex Feb 2020 #31
So, you're saying that Democratic voters just aren't as perceptive as you are? brooklynite Feb 2020 #49
Yes, that's true. Even you think average Democrats are just like you. MineralMan Feb 2020 #56
I know I'm not average, I'm from the progressive wing of the party, I don't deny that. DanTex Feb 2020 #61
I'm not going to say anything about any of that. MineralMan Feb 2020 #62
I live in NYC, yes. Texas is where I lived when I signed up for DU in 2002. DanTex Feb 2020 #63
Lucky you. It's a great city. MineralMan Feb 2020 #64
It is a great place to live. DanTex Feb 2020 #65
I could live there easily, but live where I do for various reasons. MineralMan Feb 2020 #66
Really? As someone who lived in NYC during the 12 years of Mayor Bloomberg and the other mayors DAngelo136 Feb 2020 #11
This is a truly fascinating rant... brooklynite Feb 2020 #29
Yes, Yes, Yes Me. Feb 2020 #38
Darn keys are right next to each other. n/t rzemanfl Feb 2020 #53
I've lived in the New York City area since 1974. patphil Feb 2020 #21
Bloomberg had a huge event in AZ yesterday. grantcart Feb 2020 #22
'Brought the crowd to a roaring ovation with a full throated introduction of Mark Kelly.' elleng Feb 2020 #28
This. sheshe2 Feb 2020 #34
thank you for that on the ground report from Cha Feb 2020 #45
Interesting, thanks chia Feb 2020 #55
Thanks elleng Feb 2020 #26
But They Will Care The Way He Cheated & Maipulated To Get That 3rd Term Me. Feb 2020 #37
No. Not at all. brooklynite Feb 2020 #48
Maybe You Don't Mind Being Cheated Me. Feb 2020 #67
The people who were "cheated" didn't have to vote for him in 2009. They did. brooklynite Feb 2020 #70
If You Know So Much Me. Feb 2020 #72
Explain it simply... brooklynite Feb 2020 #73
Ah, I'm Guessing This Strong Defense Of Him Means ... Me. Feb 2020 #74
Nope. But I found him competent and productive as Mayor. As did most New Yorkers. brooklynite Feb 2020 #75
Rose Colored Glasses Me. Feb 2020 #79
So people were opposed to overturning turn limits, and voted for Bloomberg anyway? brooklynite Feb 2020 #80
Now You're Just Being Disingenuous Me. Feb 2020 #81
I'm not being disingenuous ; I'm being realistic. brooklynite Feb 2020 #82
As I Said Your Answer Is In #11 Me. Feb 2020 #83
And your response was in #29 brooklynite Feb 2020 #86
Personally I hate term limits for obvious reasons grantcart Feb 2020 #59
The People Of The City Voted For & Passed Term Limits Me. Feb 2020 #68
Both Democrats... brooklynite Feb 2020 #71
If he turns out to be our best hope... VarryOn Feb 2020 #40
If my choices are Bloomberg or Trump, then it's a no-brainer... Bloomberg 100 times out of 100. RockRaven Feb 2020 #42
Yep he acknowledged his mistake less than 90 days ago - to run for office! redqueen Feb 2020 #44
If Joe doesn't make it mainstreetonce Feb 2020 #51
Rec. cwydro Feb 2020 #57
In the end, Democrats will decide who they want as their nominee. MineralMan Feb 2020 #58
How about raising taxes on the middle class Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #69
The tax plan he has proposed raises the corporate tax rate by 33% and Squinch Feb 2020 #76
Here is a study of that plan Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #84
Thats from 2002. Maybe you should read the new one. Squinch Feb 2020 #85
You mean this one? brooklynite Feb 2020 #88
Yes. It looks pretty fabulous to me. Squinch Feb 2020 #89
Or people can look at what he actually did when he had power Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #92
NYC doesn't have a tax policy (it's a State matter). brooklynite Feb 2020 #93
Actually it does Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #96
That is the plan that he enacted in NYC Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #91
No, actually he didn't. Squinch Feb 2020 #95
Then you're denying reality Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #98
That was his proposal before he entered office. It didn't happen. So no, I'm not. Squinch Feb 2020 #99
So his proposals don't count Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #100
I get that you REALLY want the Daily News article from 2002 to REALLY matter. Let's agree Squinch Feb 2020 #102
I could care less about promises Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #104
I'll take that to mean you found nothing to object to. Because, really, his proposal is great. Squinch Feb 2020 #105
No it means I trust a Billionaire about as far as I can throw Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #106
Bloomberg's record, meaning an article from the Daily News from 2002 about a proposal that Squinch Feb 2020 #108
Yes his record Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #109
Well those are different. Your insistence that he's terrible on taxes was simply wrong, but Squinch Feb 2020 #110
He was terrible on taxes Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #111
Ooooohhhh! Squinch Feb 2020 #112
If you want to ignore his track record Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #113
Have a lovely evening! Squinch Feb 2020 #114
You too Dem4Life1102 Feb 2020 #115
The old 'don't look at my record, look at my words on my website' routine. aikoaiko Feb 2020 #77
No, people are welcome to look at his record... brooklynite Feb 2020 #78
He was an excellent leader for very challenging times jumptheshadow Feb 2020 #90
Post removed Post removed Feb 2020 #94
"Democrat party"? LongtimeAZDem Feb 2020 #97
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2020 #101
That's not what the poster is saying padah513 Feb 2020 #107
As much as I would like an ideal world... jumptheshadow Feb 2020 #116
What kind of question is that, Lord Wilmore? No one on this Cha Feb 2020 #119
Hah! Like a neon sign, isn't it? Squinch Feb 2020 #103
I guess you've forgotten that he orchestrated a repeal choie Feb 2020 #117
And Democratic voters chose to re-elect him. How democratic of them... brooklynite Feb 2020 #120
how democratic choie Feb 2020 #121
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»As someone who lived in N...»Reply #88