Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Mister Ed

(6,993 posts)

1. Thank you for these details, and for your work as a precinct caucus chair.

Reply to MineralMan (Original post)

Tue Feb 4, 2020, 12:26 PM

Feb 2020

Small detail: you probably meant for your headline to be "How the 2016 Minnesota caucus worked", rather than, "How the 2016 Minnesota primary worked"?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How the 2016 Minnesota Caucuses Worked [View all] MineralMan Feb 2020 OP

Thank you for these details, and for your work as a precinct caucus chair. Mister Ed Feb 2020 #1

Oops. Thanks! I fixed it. MineralMan Feb 2020 #2

I believe this is more or less how Iowa worked previously LeftInTX Feb 2020 #3

Yes, except that Iowa has two gatherings of attendees, MineralMan Feb 2020 #4

BTW,we adopted the same Wellstone ruled Feb 2020 #5

I like paper ballots. They provide a trail that can be verified. MineralMan Feb 2020 #6

The Caucus system can be gamed. Wellstone ruled Feb 2020 #7

The caucus system is almost always gamed. MineralMan Feb 2020 #8

Oh yes, Wellstone ruled Feb 2020 #9