Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: CNN's John King admits story Biden would try to block IA results release was BS from rival campaigns [View all]George II
(67,782 posts)4. Would it surprise anyone if that "report" came from David Sirota?
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
CNN's John King admits story Biden would try to block IA results release was BS from rival campaigns [View all]
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
OP
David Sirota has a history of stuff like this, including setting up a fake website....
George II
Feb 2020
#36
"A lie will make it around the world before the truth has it's boots on."
LongtimeAZDem
Feb 2020
#26
David Sirota is retweeting the crap out of that from others. Clever, get someone to make something..
George II
Feb 2020
#17
Let me guess which rival campaign that would be? I suspect it is the one who seems
still_one
Feb 2020
#16
Link to the locked thread to facilitate 'not a good look' searches for those who need a laugh.
Scurrilous
Feb 2020
#35
Hmm, self deleted without even acknowledging that it was a fake story in the first place.
George II
Feb 2020
#37
Hah hah. NOT A GOOD LOOK for whomever started it, John King, and those who fell for it.
emmaverybo
Feb 2020
#65
what the hell does that even mean? Reading that statement was like reading while drunk..
samnsara
Feb 2020
#20
If you mean King's tweet, it was a badly written, desperate attempt to blame his stupid mistake
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#28
JPR couldn't do this. This BS came from someone fairly high up in a rival campaign.
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#38
Walking what back? This was a lie spread by a rival campaign. Ratfucking.
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#49
Oh for the love of God!! you know, sometimes you cannot make this stuff up!.
Peacetrain
Feb 2020
#51
This wasn't just spin. This was ratfucking, and I hope we find out which campaign did it.
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#55
That's right - it was a BS story..knowing which campaign doesn't matter...the infighting
asiliveandbreathe
Feb 2020
#57
You don't seem to be bothered that it was an flat-out lie; would you be OK if Sanders was the target?
LongtimeAZDem
Feb 2020
#67
It has been retracted by the reporter as having come from a rival campaign. Your response implies
LongtimeAZDem
Feb 2020
#77
Vote Blue No matter who..but, does that mean the primary has to be nasty..
asiliveandbreathe
Feb 2020
#68
So, you're cool with more lies in the future, because it is "the nature of the primary"?
LongtimeAZDem
Feb 2020
#81
Unless you can produce evidence that an actual Biden campaign official stated their intent to
LongtimeAZDem
Feb 2020
#91
LD25AZ here..couldn't agree more..which candidate released internal data
asiliveandbreathe
Feb 2020
#84
Dear lordie. All supporters of other candidates have vowed again and again here to "vote
emmaverybo
Feb 2020
#72
I have repeatedly said I will not accuse without proof. Whomever is behind it needs to be exposed.
LongtimeAZDem
Feb 2020
#71
Like deliberately lying about a candidate's positions by using doctored video?
LongtimeAZDem
Feb 2020
#88
Saying, "hmm two guesses who did X", is NOT the same as falsely saying "Person A did X".
MH1
Feb 2020
#94
This gives us an indication of who put out the false claim about Biden's campaign "suing":
George II
Feb 2020
#89
And that was posted two hours after the story was retracted, which means that whether they were
LongtimeAZDem
Feb 2020
#103
I'm disgusted by the way "news" networks handled the caucuses, before and after.
ecstatic
Feb 2020
#95
Well, it doesn't make sense for Democrats. W did that in 2000 with Florida
robbedvoter
Feb 2020
#105