Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

(96 posts)

6. Or maybe his numbers were not skewed.

Tue Feb 4, 2020, 07:08 PM

Feb 2020

Ever consider that?

We literally had to wait till 5 PM EST the next day to get results from Iowa this year. And only 62% at that!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, as I suspected, the numbers Bernie's campaign put out earlier were skewed [View all] scheming daemons Feb 2020 OP

They were dishonest? Shocking, ain't it? Squinch Feb 2020 #2

Precisely Me. Feb 2020 #3

This, and as I understand it,the rural areas are not in those numbers Thekaspervote Feb 2020 #7

Less candidates last time than now. OliverQ Feb 2020 #10

I have studied the Iowa caucus today YAWN Watchfoxheadexplodes Feb 2020 #5

Or maybe his numbers were not skewed. Progress_Dem Feb 2020 #6

Oh right awesomerwb1 Feb 2020 #9

Just asked you to consider another possibility Progress_Dem Feb 2020 #12

The implication will be there shortly* awesomerwb1 Feb 2020 #15

Dumb to put out a partial result. OneMoreCupOfCoffee Feb 2020 #8

I fully agree! Progress_Dem Feb 2020 #14

KR!!! Cha Feb 2020 #11