Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Kamala Harris' mortgage meltdown record under scrutiny as campaign heats up [View all]bigtree
(94,649 posts)26. lol
This is a roundabout way to lamely blame her for not prosecuting Muchin.
We didnt have the legal ability because of the way the rules were written in favor of the banks in terms of our subpoena powers as the state attorney general, Harris said.
Daily Kos:
First and foremost, lets point out that of all the attorney generals and elected representatives in the country during the financial crisis, there was ONE who chose to investigate and who went after the banks for a settlement. That was Kamala Harris. She didnt get any prosecutions or convictions, but she did strong-arm the banks into turning a $2 billion settlement proposal into $25 billion of immediate payments.
This cant be overlooked. Sen. Harris was entirely responsible for pulling out of negotiations in 2011 in order to force the banks to pay more. And it worked. So before you get all high and mighty about how you would have for sure jailed some bankers, weigh what good it did California families to get $25 billion compared to what they would have gotten from watching a complex civil proceeding play out over five years.
She got money to people losing their homes, and that was more important.
On the OneWest issue, its a misnomer (ie, lie) that Harris didnt prosecute Mnuchin. He was never under investigation, and Harris didnt receive a referral to criminally prosecute anyone. What she got was a recommendation to file a civil enforcement action against OneWest. In such a filing, no one person is accused of anything. Instead, an entire company is looked at, and perhaps fined for wrongdoing.
So why didnt she file the action? Well, Senator Harris isnt exactly free to openly discuss that, because we dont openly discuss investigations. Its not appropriate to discuss partial evidence, suspicions, or rumors. This harms the party under investigation, who has a right to a presumption of innocence.
But the reasons this didnt go anywhere are likely far simpler...
read more: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/21/1827095/-Kamala-Harris-and-the-big-lie-that-she-didn-t-prosecute-Mnuchin
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kamala Harris' mortgage meltdown record under scrutiny as campaign heats up [View all]
left-of-center2012
Apr 2019
OP
Lets make sure we find every possible negative thing to say about ALL democrats while a fucking
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2019
#2
I have predicted everything so far correctly and you dont want to know what I think
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2019
#35
Exactly this. Read the whole article, the whole truth. I support Kamala Harris. I favor Biden
WheelWalker
Apr 2019
#29
The most troubling part is that her staff wanted to prosecute and she overruled them
Power 2 the People
Apr 2019
#14
I support all Democrats and I support Kamala Harris I don't give a fuck about this. nt
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#19
Another reason could have been that her office didn't have the budget
The Velveteen Ocelot
Apr 2019
#24
You're not helping your candidate posting this kind of stuff on other candidates.
redstateblues
Apr 2019
#23
The thing it is sad to see people that say they are democrats doing this type of nonsense.
Blue_true
Apr 2019
#45