Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Kamala Harris' mortgage meltdown record under scrutiny as campaign heats up [View all]namahage
(1,160 posts)31. Do you know how long that civil enforcement would have taken?
Even the attorneys filing the memo admitted that there was substantial risk of litigation:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3250383-OneWest-Package-Memo.html
Expected Outcome and Timeline: If the proposed enforcement action is authorized, the primary goals will be to obtain liability findings and to hold OneWest publicly accountable for its misconduct. If we succeed, we will seek extensive injunctive relief, penalties, restitution, and costs. We anticipate a removal fight, substantial motion practice, a civil discovery
process (because of our inability to subpoena OneWest and its obstructive conduct), and a trial. Absent settlement, we expect that the litigation will last 3 to 5 years.
Likelihood of Success: Moderate. The proposed enforcement action would be the first of its kind in California and it raises complex legal and factual issues which may lessen the prospect of settlement and/or require appellate review. If we take the enforcement action to trial, we face a higher than average risk that the court may choose to award minimal amounts in restitution and/or penalties. We nevertheless expect to obtain a liability finding and secure injunctive relief. We believe that there is substantial public justice value in fully investigating OneWest's conduct through the use of civil discovery and holding it publicly accountable, even if sizable penalties and restitution are not awarded.
Resources: We expect resource intensive and prolonged litigation. We will need 2-3 full-time DAGs, substantial SDAG time, auditor time, and paralegal time. Outside expert (testifying and consulting) support will be required to assist us as we review and evaluate data regarding the tens of thousands of relevant foreclosures conducted by OneWest.
...
CONS:
...
High potential for delays. For example, it could easily be a year or two before we get past the removal and pleadings stages into merits discovery.
We may be at odds with certain federal agencies. It is possible that the OCC will side with OneWest or that the FDIC will intervene.
process (because of our inability to subpoena OneWest and its obstructive conduct), and a trial. Absent settlement, we expect that the litigation will last 3 to 5 years.
Likelihood of Success: Moderate. The proposed enforcement action would be the first of its kind in California and it raises complex legal and factual issues which may lessen the prospect of settlement and/or require appellate review. If we take the enforcement action to trial, we face a higher than average risk that the court may choose to award minimal amounts in restitution and/or penalties. We nevertheless expect to obtain a liability finding and secure injunctive relief. We believe that there is substantial public justice value in fully investigating OneWest's conduct through the use of civil discovery and holding it publicly accountable, even if sizable penalties and restitution are not awarded.
Resources: We expect resource intensive and prolonged litigation. We will need 2-3 full-time DAGs, substantial SDAG time, auditor time, and paralegal time. Outside expert (testifying and consulting) support will be required to assist us as we review and evaluate data regarding the tens of thousands of relevant foreclosures conducted by OneWest.
...
CONS:
...
High potential for delays. For example, it could easily be a year or two before we get past the removal and pleadings stages into merits discovery.
We may be at odds with certain federal agencies. It is possible that the OCC will side with OneWest or that the FDIC will intervene.
Harris got a big win, instead of trying to pursue a costly, time-consuming, risky enforcement that could very well have failed. How many homeowners were you willing to sacrifice for your symbolic victory?
Oh, and that contribution from Mnuchin went really far, considering she then introduced a bill to make it easier for future state AGs to subpoena national banks (which had tied her office's hands previously), not to mention voting against his confirmation as Treasury Secretary.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kamala Harris' mortgage meltdown record under scrutiny as campaign heats up [View all]
left-of-center2012
Apr 2019
OP
Lets make sure we find every possible negative thing to say about ALL democrats while a fucking
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2019
#2
I have predicted everything so far correctly and you dont want to know what I think
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2019
#35
Exactly this. Read the whole article, the whole truth. I support Kamala Harris. I favor Biden
WheelWalker
Apr 2019
#29
The most troubling part is that her staff wanted to prosecute and she overruled them
Power 2 the People
Apr 2019
#14
I support all Democrats and I support Kamala Harris I don't give a fuck about this. nt
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#19
Another reason could have been that her office didn't have the budget
The Velveteen Ocelot
Apr 2019
#24
You're not helping your candidate posting this kind of stuff on other candidates.
redstateblues
Apr 2019
#23
The thing it is sad to see people that say they are democrats doing this type of nonsense.
Blue_true
Apr 2019
#45