Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

BlueMTexpat

(15,366 posts)
Fri Feb 7, 2020, 11:14 AM Feb 2020

The Erasure of Elizabeth Warren Continues [View all]

The media is ignoring that Warren beat Joe Biden, the Democratic front-runner, and outperformed her final polling.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/elizabeth-warren-iowa-caucus/

...
Iowa conventional wisdom says there are only “three tickets out” of the caucuses, and yet coverage has curiously overlooked the woman who got one of them: Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren. From the moment cable networks switched from her caucus night rally speech to Biden’s, Warren has been virtually erased. As the fight for first place continued into Thursday, I have watched cable news panels mention Warren only in passing, if at all (MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell had been one exception, featuring an interview with Warren Wednesday night, and then on Thursday night she was hosted by Chris Hayes).

This despite the fact that Warren clearly beat the Democratic front-runner, Biden, and outperformed her numbers in the final Des Moines Register poll (spiked because of one complaint—one—from a Buttigieg supporter who said she wasn’t asked about him by a pollster), which had Warren in second at 18 percent; with 97 percent of the results in, she finished at 20 percent, in third, with Sanders and Buttigieg effectively tied (though Sanders on Thursday declared victory, and he may ultimately be right). Despite being derided as a New England progressive who might not connect with heavily rural and suburban Iowa, she beat two rivals who were said to have the inside track with those voters—Biden and Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar, who came in at a disappointing fifth place.

“From the beginning, all of the women in the race—Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Warren—have known they were facing erasure,” says former Iowa Democratic Party chair Sue Dvorsky, who switched her support from Harris to Warren after Harris left the race in December. “Elizabeth has known she has to just stay in there and keep fighting and just not quit.”
...
With another strong ground game in New Hampshire, Warren continues to bank on a women-powered campaign, announcing a Sunday get-out-the-vote event in Concord with her all-female team of campaign co-chairs, Representatives Deb Haaland, Katie Porter, and Ayanna Pressley. Her campaign released this video starring Jane Fonda, Ashley Nicole Black, Yvette Nicole Brown, and Ashley Judd, along with Haaland, Porter, and Pressley (plus special male backers like activist Ady Barkan and singer Lance Bass).
...
Still, after the divisiveness of Iowa, “Warren continues to make a cogent case for unity” that may resonate more loudly, Dvorsky says, in the days to come. Meanwhile, she worries about the unexpectedly low turnout at this year’s caucuses, roughly on par with 2016, despite there being at least five competitive candidates and another several with devoted Iowa backers still campaigning in the closing days. “Maybe people were just worn out after a year of campaigning here, but we’re going to need to do better than that to beat Trump in November.”


*********************
Whatever happens in New Hampshire, Elizabeth will continue to persist.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yep. Haven't heard this all week: Mike 03 Feb 2020 #1
It's interesting how much our BlueMTexpat Feb 2020 #4
Plus there's the ageism/sexism dynamic going on. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2020 #23
Bernie said she can't win. n/t zackymilly Feb 2020 #36
That got her more media coverage than her performance in Iowa by far. She KPN Feb 2020 #45
In that case, I do suppose theres no reason to keep voting... Volaris Feb 2020 #51
This article is crap squirecam Feb 2020 #14
Amy killed it in the satellite caucuses I heard play out on CNN. Mike 03 Feb 2020 #24
if she wants to spike things up she could lead some protests at the 87 universities that certainot Feb 2020 #41
I wonder how much Wall St bankers have to do with the big chill. Doremus Feb 2020 #64
Warren is setup to campaign hard thru Super Tuesday. bluewater Feb 2020 #2
+1 The funding matters at this point. n/t Laelth Feb 2020 #81
Elizabeth Warren deserves better than she is getting. democrank Feb 2020 #3
She will certainly persist. eom BlueMTexpat Feb 2020 #5
Of course she will Bettie Feb 2020 #47
Nevertheless ;) nt mr_lebowski Feb 2020 #53
I don't get it. no_hypocrisy Feb 2020 #6
I'm not sure that I've BlueMTexpat Feb 2020 #7
The piling on Warren is a political strategem bluewater Feb 2020 #13
The debate last night seemed to exclude her. Alex4Martinez Feb 2020 #84
Four years ago it was a 2 person race for all practical purposes. bluewater Feb 2020 #10
misogyny, bernie, and shining new thing combined explain it Fresh_Start Feb 2020 #11
Clinton carried much more political clout going in. warren has to gain it bit by bit. Kurt V. Feb 2020 #25
HRC was going to keep on keeping the rich people rich FiveGoodMen Feb 2020 #29
bingo questionseverything Feb 2020 #71
She is a Candidate of Substance and Truth McKim Feb 2020 #8
Well put. BlueWI Feb 2020 #73
Persist she will, Dream big! Fight hard! I love her enthusiasm Baclava Feb 2020 #9
The media consistently disappoints, chia Feb 2020 #12
I agree plus MSM will give tRump 2,3,4 times the airtime than any of our candidates. nt yaesu Feb 2020 #15
No surprise there. He's the president. Drunken Irishman Feb 2020 #17
But Obama's "presidential" speeches weren't 100% campaign rhetoric & lies. nt yaesu Feb 2020 #19
No. But any time a president gives a speech in an election year, it's pretty much a campaign speech. Drunken Irishman Feb 2020 #21
Agreed that this Iowa vote should mean very little in the long run. Baitball Blogger Feb 2020 #16
Indeed. (nt) ehrnst Feb 2020 #18
It should be an outrage. She is wonderful!!! 58Sunliner Feb 2020 #20
As progressives, Liz and Bernie will receive the cold shoulder from the moderate DNC. Magoo48 Feb 2020 #22
I would love to see Warren and Sanders as the ticket AverageJoe Feb 2020 #31
Same here Magoo48 Feb 2020 #32
Same here. JudyM Feb 2020 #42
I'd be fine with it either way woundedkarma Feb 2020 #44
+1 OneCrazyDiamond Feb 2020 #57
I doubt it... druidity33 Feb 2020 #70
I'm all for that. May it be so! Magoo48 Feb 2020 #78
The media has decided that because America overwhelmingly voted for Hillary edhopper Feb 2020 #26
Its still a boys club at the top. the only way to break that glass ceiling is to be first lady Kurt V. Feb 2020 #27
I don't really think about it woundedkarma Feb 2020 #46
Warren would be a great President AverageJoe Feb 2020 #28
BS and Mayor Pete have the MSM spotlight and attention. democratisphere Feb 2020 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author dalton99a Feb 2020 #55
Politics is a zero-sum game... brooklynite Feb 2020 #33
I do believe there is a deliberate attempt to "cull the herd" going on. patphil Feb 2020 #34
Well if we listen to the media, it's only Bernie and Buttigieg. I call BS. Only 1 of 50 states has iluvtennis Feb 2020 #35
Just to review... brooklynite Feb 2020 #37
Lawrence O'Donnell had Liz on on Wednesday after the Senate vote. And Amy. He'll have them again. ancianita Feb 2020 #38
They did the same thing to John Edwards a few years ago -- Liberty Belle Feb 2020 #39
Yes, and his polling bounce was ignored unc70 Feb 2020 #48
I remember suspecting that Rove was having the Enquirer follow him sandensea Feb 2020 #49
I am not surprised ismnotwasm Feb 2020 #40
Good. Let the GOP and media continue to focus on Biden and their manufactured dirt on him Mr. Ected Feb 2020 #43
So give Trump and Republicans Biden--for the good of Dems? No. Fight their propaganda about emmaverybo Feb 2020 #56
K & R SunSeeker Feb 2020 #50
I know. It's baffling. LisaM Feb 2020 #52
They are both losing...one more than the other. That's the headline..and also dumps plan worked. nt UniteFightBack Feb 2020 #54
Stevie Smith had it right (1962). B Stieg Feb 2020 #58
Thanks for posting that. BlueMTexpat Feb 2020 #62
It's a great, sadly true poem. B Stieg Feb 2020 #65
I think that is the case BlueMTexpat Feb 2020 #67
Great poem. JudyM Feb 2020 #74
I think the book link I've listed below... B Stieg Feb 2020 #75
Thanks. Here's that poem... it's called "Away, Melancholy." JudyM Feb 2020 #80
Thanks for sharing this! B Stieg Feb 2020 #82
Seeing the attacks on Warren yesterday, being used as a weapon, disgusted me. krissey Feb 2020 #59
Damned when she does; BlueMTexpat Feb 2020 #63
Excellent point! maybe issues matter... KSNY Feb 2020 #60
I'm for Pete, but this is absolutely correct Steven Maurer Feb 2020 #61
My sentiments exactly Blue Owl Feb 2020 #69
I think she will persist... Mike Nelson Feb 2020 #66
I think that BlueMTexpat Feb 2020 #68
Everything is great about Elizabeth Warren except national electability in 2020 Awsi Dooger Feb 2020 #72
This article is so spot on! She is awesome, and they are ignoring her. Scotch-Irish Feb 2020 #76
K&R! n/t PandoraAwakened Feb 2020 #77
This is sad. Warren is one of the good ones. Lucky Luciano Feb 2020 #79
"Erasure?" Sounds more like a nonsense excuse for campaign disappointment. tritsofme Feb 2020 #83
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»The Erasure of Elizabeth ...»Reply #0