Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

peggysue2

(12,587 posts)
43. Rebuttal on the issue
Tue Apr 2, 2019, 08:28 PM
Apr 2019

The following was written by Roger Sollenberger, a self-proclaimed progressive (bold is my addition):

But Harris chose not to prosecute OneWest Bank or its CEO—who was at the time our current Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin—even though her department recommended prosecuting him. (Harris was the only Democratic Senate candidate Mnuchin donated to in 2016, but she still voted against Mnuchin in his Senate confirmation.)

When asked about the case, Harris said her department followed the evidence where it led. There’s reason to trust her. Ian Sams, the Harris campaign’s national press secretary, told CNBC, “There was no question One West conducted predatory lending, and Senator Harris believes they should be punished. Unfortunately, the law was squarely on their side and they were shielded from state subpoenas because they’re a federal bank.” A memo the California Justice Department wrote at the time backs this up, saying, “the investigation was hampered by our inability to subpoena OneWest.”

And guess what? Once Harris got to the Senate she acted to fix this awful flaw. She co-sponsored a bill with Elizabeth Warren and Dianne Feinstein—called the “Accountability for Wall Street Executives Act”—that would let state law enforcement agencies issue subpoenas in bank fraud investigations.

A few details makes this far less accusatory and/or negligent on Harris' part, and the fact that once in the Senate she worked diligently to correct the legal flaw is a definite check mark in her favor.

Source here:

https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2019/02/the-case-for-kamala-harris.html

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So are we going to get the whole story or just wasupaloopa Apr 2019 #1
THIS is why I dont bother around her much anymore... Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #4
Lets make sure we find every possible negative thing to say about ALL democrats while a fucking Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #2
Existential threat staring us in the face and . . . peggysue2 Apr 2019 #9
That is way to much work. sheshe2 Apr 2019 #27
I have predicted everything so far correctly and you dont want to know what I think Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #35
+1 Hassler Apr 2019 #17
I would suggest that everyone read the whole article, DURHAM D Apr 2019 #3
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ still_one Apr 2019 #5
No need for that, you see ... mr_lebowski Apr 2019 #8
Housing advocate Paulina Gonzalez Brito also said this - DURHAM D Apr 2019 #12
I was kidding, but thanks :) (nt) mr_lebowski Apr 2019 #13
I wasnt sure either, if you were kidding. this is FUCKING MADNESS Eliot Rosewater Apr 2019 #36
You know I share your frustration ER :) (nt) mr_lebowski Apr 2019 #37
Exactly this. Read the whole article, the whole truth. I support Kamala Harris. I favor Biden WheelWalker Apr 2019 #29
I dont give a squat what Harris did with One West Bank. Chipper Chat Apr 2019 #6
Okay DURHAM D Apr 2019 #15
It's nothing. Dawson Leery Apr 2019 #7
I support here also Andy823 Apr 2019 #10
Strange Andy823 Apr 2019 #11
The hits keep coming. One candidate one day, the Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #30
The most troubling part is that her staff wanted to prosecute and she overruled them Power 2 the People Apr 2019 #14
Then she might be asked about it at some point. The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2019 #22
Sure if you pick the parts of the article you can use against her. wasupaloopa Apr 2019 #28
+1...nt SidDithers Apr 2019 #44
Do you know how long that civil enforcement would have taken? namahage Apr 2019 #31
Let's just keep those hit jobs coming, folks. The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2019 #16
+1 Hassler Apr 2019 #18
I support all Democrats and I support Kamala Harris I don't give a fuck about this. nt UniteFightBack Apr 2019 #19
There are many reasons to not sue besides BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #20
Another reason could have been that her office didn't have the budget The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2019 #24
Has she said why she didn't go after Steven Mnuchin? jalan48 Apr 2019 #21
You're not helping your candidate posting this kind of stuff on other candidates. redstateblues Apr 2019 #23
Comes from the candidate, like Pete jaceaf Apr 2019 #25
''Tis true redstateblues Apr 2019 #33
lol bigtree Apr 2019 #26
Thanks. DURHAM D Apr 2019 #32
Who else has this in their resume? tirebiter Apr 2019 #34
You are on fire! WeekiWater Apr 2019 #38
She really does have what it takes Andy823 Apr 2019 #39
So Kamala didn't pursue shaky litigation or use her office to comradebillyboy Apr 2019 #40
Did she have enough evidence on OneWest? Blue_true Apr 2019 #41
And if the enforcement ultimately failed, namahage Apr 2019 #42
The thing it is sad to see people that say they are democrats doing this type of nonsense. Blue_true Apr 2019 #45
Rebuttal on the issue peggysue2 Apr 2019 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Kamala Harris' mortgage m...»Reply #43