Democratic Primaries

TwilightZone

(28,836 posts)

32. There's no proof of that.

Reply to denem (Reply #30)

Wed Feb 12, 2020, 01:41 PM

Feb 2020

It's just something you're assuming influenced enough people to make a difference. The numbers tell a different story.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden's poison pill attack ad probably cost Pete a win in NH. [View all] denem Feb 2020 OP

How many people saw that ad I wonder? I tend to think Amy K came across BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #1

I think (nearly) as many people were talking about it, denem Feb 2020 #4

I agree LeftTurn3623 Feb 2020 #2

Dont worry about that; Bernie barely won in his own neighborhood. oldsoftie Feb 2020 #3

In 2015/16, the GOP "moderates" kept putting off taking it to trump denem Feb 2020 #6

but now the race moves out of friendly territory. After Super Tuesday, let's see where he is oldsoftie Feb 2020 #10

Trump was the threat. denem Feb 2020 #15

True; and I guess it is odd that most of the negative stuff I see comes from trump oldsoftie Feb 2020 #23

The GOP was sure trump would lose the GE denem Feb 2020 #26

That doesn't make much sense. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2020 #11

I kinda think so though. Its like a Southerner winning in neighboring states. oldsoftie Feb 2020 #29

New England's state identities and cultures are fairly distinct. NH in particular. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2020 #34

Politics ain't beanbag Loki Liesmith Feb 2020 #5

Indeed it is not a bean bag. denem Feb 2020 #9

Sorry...Buttigieg went after Biden as did Warren...so too bad. It is nothing compared to what Trump Demsrule86 Feb 2020 #7

All these excuses for the fact Biden gives Sanders a free pass. denem Feb 2020 #16

The dog whistle aspect of the double decorative lights and bricks usage Celerity Feb 2020 #17

Joe is not as uncomfortable with attacks on fellow Dems as you might think. denem Feb 2020 #19

I recall that, but it was silly and easily disproven and went away quickly, but that dog whistle Celerity Feb 2020 #21

I picked up the dog whistles, as soon as I saw it denem Feb 2020 #22

It was classless indeed. Glad he pulled it; I wasn't aware he did. cwydro Feb 2020 #24

+1 emmaverybo Feb 2020 #28

What is this "poison pill" attack? Link? nt LAS14 Feb 2020 #8

A cyanide level attack. nt. denem Feb 2020 #12

The other bad thing, and the only time he has done this in a debate Celerity Feb 2020 #13

Yup.. Callado119 Feb 2020 #14

Yes Biden should have taken all Pete's attacks without giving a OnDoutside Feb 2020 #18

It's a grown up game with Sanders getting free passes. denem Feb 2020 #20

Sanders is going to be challenged. Harris and Warren got OnDoutside Feb 2020 #37

"the moderates" kept on putting off challenging trump in 2015/16 denem Feb 2020 #38

Yes, they were playing by different rules to at least Sanders OnDoutside Feb 2020 #39

Amazing to me that Pete's supporters would think Pete could constantly take big digs at Biden, emmaverybo Feb 2020 #31

I agree, it's a learning experience all round. OnDoutside Feb 2020 #36

I think it did more damage customerserviceguy Feb 2020 #25

Buttigieg out-performed the polls, so your assertion seems rather unlikely to be accurate. TwilightZone Feb 2020 #27

So the hardest attack ad of the cycle was a plus? denem Feb 2020 #30

There's no proof of that. TwilightZone Feb 2020 #32

Are you saying that the ad was a plus for Buttigieg? denem Feb 2020 #33

No biggie. Laelth Feb 2020 #35

Don't think so. Klobuchar had a spectacular debate performance, and Buttigieg wasn't highplainsdem Feb 2020 #40

I've said my piece on this HPD. denem Feb 2020 #41