Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Bloomberg Flunks the Wokeness Test [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)45. Umm, did you read the next paragraph?
Like I said, I completely understand why a conservative who thinks Republicans pushing voter ID laws "aren't bigots" would support someone like Bloomberg.
That said, comparisons with the Souths naked suppression of the black vote before the Voting Rights Act of 1965 are overstated. What the Republicans are doing now is brutally cynical, but doesnt compare with efforts from that earlier era, when Southerners were motivated by a conviction that blacks were subhumans, Nigras best taken care of like chattel. Recall, for example, that from the 1930s on, after blacks allegiance started shifting to Democrats in the wake of FDRs New Deal, these Southerners were suppressing votes that would have gone significantly to their own party.
Todays Republicans pretending such a concern about voter ID are, by contrast, inspired purely by the prospect of short-term political gain. Ive been acquainted with a couple of conservatives who think of these voter laws as a canny political gain. They arent bigots; its a matter of priority. They instinctively seize political advantage wherever they can get it: In 1990s, they were just as rabidly devoted to overthrowing Bill Clinton. For them, political philosophy and power trumps concern about black peoples feelings or fate. The logic is pretty simple: because blacks vote so overwhelmingly Democratic, suppressing black votes is a handy way to minimizing Democratic electoral gains. A computer would come up with that calculus in microseconds. A computer, after all, has no feelingsand when it comes to Americas racial fabric one might say the same about these Republican operatives.
Todays Republicans pretending such a concern about voter ID are, by contrast, inspired purely by the prospect of short-term political gain. Ive been acquainted with a couple of conservatives who think of these voter laws as a canny political gain. They arent bigots; its a matter of priority. They instinctively seize political advantage wherever they can get it: In 1990s, they were just as rabidly devoted to overthrowing Bill Clinton. For them, political philosophy and power trumps concern about black peoples feelings or fate. The logic is pretty simple: because blacks vote so overwhelmingly Democratic, suppressing black votes is a handy way to minimizing Democratic electoral gains. A computer would come up with that calculus in microseconds. A computer, after all, has no feelingsand when it comes to Americas racial fabric one might say the same about these Republican operatives.
Here he is making the same argument (and others, like calling antiracism a "religion" ) in the National Review.
https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2015/11/19/black-america-and-right/
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I support Bloomberg 'casue I think he has the best chance and the means to defeat Trump
Kaleva
Feb 2020
#1
"I think we disproportionately stop whites too much, and minorities too little"
phleshdef
Feb 2020
#5
Crime bill 1994. Very similar results, but on a national level from both Biden and Bernie.
Amimnoch
Feb 2020
#10
A majority of the members of the Congressional Black Caucus voted for the 1994 Crime Bill.
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2020
#17
Massive false equivalency. Bloomberg specifically said black people should be targeted by policy.
phleshdef
Feb 2020
#22
So true based on Democratic principles youd think we all share;its not even arguable yet here we are
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2020
#18
Not surprising that a conservative who supported George W Bush would support Bloomberg.
DanTex
Feb 2020
#7
LOL. He said George Bush is the best thing to happen to Black America in 35 years!
DanTex
Feb 2020
#20
I would draw the line if McWhorter said he was "nauseated by John Kennedy"
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2020
#24
Not sure what that has to do with McWhorter being a Bush-supporting conservative.
DanTex
Feb 2020
#26
How should we weigh the opinion of candidates who said they were "nauseated by John Kennedy" ?
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2020
#28
I'm not outraged, I'm just pointing out that McWhorter is a conservative, so it makes sense that
DanTex
Feb 2020
#36
Right, that's part of his game. Write conservative articles for the National Review
DanTex
Feb 2020
#38
He defended the policy up until he decided to run. He also mounted a rogue counter-terrorism
emmaverybo
Feb 2020
#13
Who is afraid, for example, that Bloomberg would try to reimpose unduly punitive policies like that
tulipsandroses
Feb 2020
#23
I'm not. He wouldn't be getting the endorsements he's getting if that were so.
Amimnoch
Feb 2020
#29
I believe he would because he has a bigoted world-view and he believes as he has said that to
emmaverybo
Feb 2020
#34
At the same time he was bankrolling republicans and holding fundraisers for the likes of Peter King
tulipsandroses
Feb 2020
#32
He is running because he doesn't want Warren or Sanders- not because he wants to beat Trump
MoonlitKnight
Feb 2020
#31