Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

CalFione

(571 posts)
Mon Feb 17, 2020, 01:31 PM Feb 2020

Getting rid of Citizens United wouldn't stop what Bloomberg and Steyer are doing [View all]

Even before the Citizens United decision, there was never any limit to how much PERSONAL wealth a candidate could spend on their own campaign.

If Citizens United were thrown out tomorrow, Mike Bloomberg and Tom Steyer could still spend as much money as they wanted on the campaign.

And I don't believe there will ever be a SCOTUS, even if it were made up of 9 liberal justices, that would rule it is constitutional to block a person from spending their OWN money on a campaign.

So... the only way to beat billionaires is at the ballot box. We can keep them from funding other people's campaigns by overturning Citizens United, but we can't stop them from funding their own.


If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is why we need public funding of elections. HerbChestnut Feb 2020 #1
Bingo! nt Quixote1818 Feb 2020 #6
Even if elections were publicly funded.... CalFione Feb 2020 #10
Actually it could, if congress had the courage to pass a law prohibiting it Fiendish Thingy Feb 2020 #2
Campaign Finance Reform Now! no_hypocrisy Feb 2020 #3
Campaign finance reform won't ever be able to impact how one spends their OWN money CalFione Feb 2020 #7
I don't believe any possible SCOTUS court would rule that.... CalFione Feb 2020 #5
If the Constitution was amended, and the SCOTUS expanded by the next president, it could Fiendish Thingy Feb 2020 #15
Hard to think of how an amendment could restrict how an individual spends on themselves CalFione Feb 2020 #17
The amount of money spent on campaigns could be restricted. Merlot Feb 2020 #19
There would be massive loopholes that could be jumped through CalFione Feb 2020 #20
Buckley v viejo is what controls here dsc Feb 2020 #4
Lets compare ............................... turbinetree Feb 2020 #8
Getting rid of polio doesn't stop tuberculosis, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't. nt Xipe Totec Feb 2020 #9
Oh, I agree! CalFione Feb 2020 #12
Don't link the issues, then. nt Xipe Totec Feb 2020 #13
They're linked because of the common misconception that Citizens United is responsible for this CalFione Feb 2020 #16
I'm not really opposed to what they're doing DrToast Feb 2020 #11
Bloomberg & Steyer not quite the same problem as Citizens United. empedocles Feb 2020 #14
Why couldn't those hypothetical 9 liberal judges Merlot Feb 2020 #18
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Getting rid of Citizens U...»Reply #0