Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: 2020 Dems can't tell Bernie to lay down and die when it's his economic agenda they are hawking [View all]lapucelle
(20,925 posts)45. That endorsement interview is worth a second read.
I certainly don't hear any other Democratic candidates "hawking" anything from that cringe-worthy episode.
On breaking up the big banks:
Sanders: How you go about doing it is having legislation passed, or giving the authority to the secretary of treasury to determine, under Dodd-Frank, that these banks are a danger to the economy over the problem of too-big-to-fail.
Daily News: But do you think that the Fed, now, has that authority?
Sanders: Well, I don't know if the Fed has it. But I think the administration can have it.
Daily News: How? How does a President turn to JPMorgan Chase, or have the Treasury turn to any of those banks and say, "Now you must do X, Y and Z?"
Sanders: Well, you do have authority under the Dodd-Frank legislation to do that, make that determination.
Daily News: You do, just by Federal Reserve fiat, you do?
Sanders: Yeah. Well, I believe you do.
Daily News: But do you think that the Fed, now, has that authority?
Sanders: Well, I don't know if the Fed has it. But I think the administration can have it.
Daily News: How? How does a President turn to JPMorgan Chase, or have the Treasury turn to any of those banks and say, "Now you must do X, Y and Z?"
Sanders: Well, you do have authority under the Dodd-Frank legislation to do that, make that determination.
Daily News: You do, just by Federal Reserve fiat, you do?
Sanders: Yeah. Well, I believe you do.
snip=====================================
Daily News: Well, it does depend on how you do it, I believe. And, I'm a little bit confused because just a few minutes ago you said the U.S. President would have authority to order...
Sanders: No, I did not say we would order. I did not say that we would order. The President is not a dictator.
Daily News: Okay. You would then leave it to JPMorgan Chase or the others to figure out how to break it, themselves up. I'm not quite...
Sanders: You would determine is that, if a bank is too big to fail, it is too big to exist. And then you have the secretary of treasury and some people who know a lot about this, making that determination. If the determination is that Goldman Sachs or JPMorgan Chase is too big to fail, yes, they will be broken up.
Sanders: No, I did not say we would order. I did not say that we would order. The President is not a dictator.
Daily News: Okay. You would then leave it to JPMorgan Chase or the others to figure out how to break it, themselves up. I'm not quite...
Sanders: You would determine is that, if a bank is too big to fail, it is too big to exist. And then you have the secretary of treasury and some people who know a lot about this, making that determination. If the determination is that Goldman Sachs or JPMorgan Chase is too big to fail, yes, they will be broken up.
snip======================================================
On prosecuting bank executives responsible for the financial crisis:
Daily News: Okay. But do you have a sense that there is a particular statute or statutes that a prosecutor could have or should have invoked to bring indictments?
Sanders: I suspect that there are. Yes.
Daily News: You believe that? But do you know?
Sanders: I believe that that is the case. Do I have them in front of me, now, legal statutes? No, I don't. But if I would...yeah, that's what I believe, yes. When a company pays a $5 billion fine for doing something that's illegal, yeah, I think we can bring charges against the executives.
Daily News: I'm only pressing because you've made it such a central part of your campaign. And I wanted to know what the mechanism would be to accomplish it.
Sanders: Let me be very clear about this. Alright? Let me repeat what I have said. Maybe you've got a quote there. I do believe that, to a significant degree, the business model of Wall Street is fraud.
Sanders: I suspect that there are. Yes.
Daily News: You believe that? But do you know?
Sanders: I believe that that is the case. Do I have them in front of me, now, legal statutes? No, I don't. But if I would...yeah, that's what I believe, yes. When a company pays a $5 billion fine for doing something that's illegal, yeah, I think we can bring charges against the executives.
Daily News: I'm only pressing because you've made it such a central part of your campaign. And I wanted to know what the mechanism would be to accomplish it.
Sanders: Let me be very clear about this. Alright? Let me repeat what I have said. Maybe you've got a quote there. I do believe that, to a significant degree, the business model of Wall Street is fraud.
I live in NY where we have a Democratic governor who delivered on his promise of a $15 minimum wage and free state university.
Broad strokes and vague assurances won't work. We are not easily bamboozled.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
2020 Dems can't tell Bernie to lay down and die when it's his economic agenda they are hawking [View all]
Uncle Joe
Feb 2019
OP
OMG not Democratic Socialism!!! I suggest you pick another candidate then
LiberalLovinLug
Feb 2019
#32
He shouldn't "lay down and die" he should run in the primary and see what happens.
Agschmid
Feb 2019
#8
Gee, I guess what is good for the goose isn't good for the gander, huh, because that is the same
still_one
Feb 2019
#36
His economic agenda is not original. Democrats have pushed most of these things before Bernie
allgood33
Feb 2019
#49
Is HA Goodman back at Salon? Democratic candidates can certainly discuss Democratic ideas that
Demsrule86
Feb 2019
#13
No it's not. That "agenda" has existed long before Sanders ever came up with it.
George II
Feb 2019
#20
Hillarious watching the anti-Bernie crowd scramble to embrace his platform
LiberalLovinLug
Feb 2019
#37
Check out the swag on the BS 2020 website. It's the only page thats's up. N/T
lapucelle
Feb 2019
#68
no one who wants to run should be dissuaded from running nor attacked for running
yaesu
Feb 2019
#26
Okay, that's fine, but when he gets eliminated in early March I hope he doesn't start complaining..
George II
Feb 2019
#50
People in Congress have been calling for Election Day to be a national holiday for decades....
George II
Feb 2019
#54
His Dalily News interview from 2016 wasn't particularly enlightening in that regard
still_one
Feb 2019
#38
Precisely - it's always "we need to....", never "I will". I saw tweets the last day or two...
George II
Feb 2019
#52
I believe Obama actually said "we WILL", but I could be wrong. I prefer that my President....
George II
Feb 2019
#75
When Chris Hayes asked BS what legislature he'd prioritize if president, he couldn't say.
betsuni
Feb 2019
#70
There's nothing on the BS 2020 site except an email address gate, a donation page, and a store.
lapucelle
Feb 2019
#59
Bernie: take classic Democratic policies, call it something slightly different, claim it's new.
betsuni
Feb 2019
#61
2020 Sanders can't offer a different path when others are running on 'his' economic agenda either.
Lancero
Feb 2019
#76
Once again, you CANT vote NO on Russian sanctions and then claim Putin is on your "list".
MrsCoffee
Feb 2019
#82
You know that there are a very large number of real democrats who have long memories
Gothmog
Feb 2019
#83