Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Beinart: Regular Democrats Just Aren't Worried About Bernie [View all]
A good article. Among activists and party insiders, it can seem like a "civil war" of Bernie vs everyone else, which explains where the "75% voted against Bernie" talking point comes from. These pundits assume that, since the pundit class is roughly divided into "pro-Bernie" and "anti-Bernie", the voters are as well. But that's just not the case. Among actual voters, not only is Bernie the most popular of the candidates, but voters who choose one of the other five or six leading contenders also have a positive opinion of Bernie, they just happen to prefer one of the others.
Judging by media coverage and the comments of party luminaries, you might think Democrats are bitterly polarized over Bernie Sanderss presidential bid. Last month, Hillary Clinton declared that nobody likes the Vermont senator. Last week, James Carville, who ran Bill Clintons 1992 campaign, said he was scared to death of the Sanders campaign, which he likened to a cult. Since the beginning of the year, news organization after news organization has speculated that Sanderss success may set off a Democratic civil war.
But polls of Democratic voters show nothing of the sort. Among ordinary Democrats, Sanders is strikingly popular, even with voters who favor his rivals. He sparks less oppositionin some cases far lessthan his major competitors. On paper, he appears well positioned to unify the party should he win its presidential nomination.
So why all the talk of civil war? Because Sanders is far more divisive among Democratic eliteswho prize institutional loyalty and ideological moderationthan Democratic voters. The danger is that by projecting their own anxieties onto rank-and-file Democrats, party insiders are exaggerating the risk of a schism if Sanders wins the nomination, and overlooking the greater risk that the party could fracture if they engineer his defeat.
But polls of Democratic voters show nothing of the sort. Among ordinary Democrats, Sanders is strikingly popular, even with voters who favor his rivals. He sparks less oppositionin some cases far lessthan his major competitors. On paper, he appears well positioned to unify the party should he win its presidential nomination.
So why all the talk of civil war? Because Sanders is far more divisive among Democratic eliteswho prize institutional loyalty and ideological moderationthan Democratic voters. The danger is that by projecting their own anxieties onto rank-and-file Democrats, party insiders are exaggerating the risk of a schism if Sanders wins the nomination, and overlooking the greater risk that the party could fracture if they engineer his defeat.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/regular-democrats-arent-least-bit-worried-about-bernie/606688/
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HRC, Obama, Carville, Frank and others coming out with negative attacks or statements either
KPN
Feb 2020
#30
The feedback loop leads people to believe DU is representative of the population as a whole.
Garrett78
Feb 2020
#22
Ironic as you recently criticized another poster for using the term "real Democrats"
LanternWaste
Feb 2020
#21
I wish everyone on DU would bookmark this article and link it to every anti-bernie
Scotch-Irish
Feb 2020
#24