Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: "Follow the rules" is not a rebuttal to "the person with the most votes/delegates should win". [View all]krissey
(1,205 posts)62. Sanders was going for thsoe very rules end of 2016, right? Can't change them as the wind blows.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Follow the rules" is not a rebuttal to "the person with the most votes/delegates should win". [View all]
DanTex
Feb 2020
OP
It makes a difference how close Bernie is to a majority of delegates, first round.
denem
Feb 2020
#3
Beat Trump, then fix the rules. I'm tired of hearing about the 2016 primary.
marble falls
Feb 2020
#4
I agree, but the debate needs to wait until after we beat Trump. I wouldn't mind if Hillary ...
marble falls
Feb 2020
#57
I do, too. I think she was ill treated and she has a bad taste of what happened ...
marble falls
Feb 2020
#59
The rules are the rules...and Hillary would not be a good idea given she has issues in the very
Demsrule86
Feb 2020
#69
As I suggested elsewhere, the ONLY way to really know the will of the people if no candidate has a
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#6
And there have been polls showing Biden crushing Sanders by as much as 29 points.
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#12
Btw, here's my OP about their Dec. poll, Biden 26 points over Sanders. 32 points in October.
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#34
However, Sweden has nearly twice the billionaires per capita than the United States
ehrnst
Feb 2020
#37
What's false is the assumption that it means he'd only get 25% in a 2-person race.
Garrett78
Feb 2020
#64
Where would he get the support Warren? I believe Warren is out after Carolina certainly after super
Demsrule86
Feb 2020
#70
Bernie would destroy our Party (not his) for a chance to get his ass kicked by Trump
PubliusEnigma
Feb 2020
#11
The party won't fracture unless Sanders and his supporters refuse to play by the rules and throw
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#13
Calling it a "tantrum" or "blackmail" will certainly not help prevent a party fracture.
DanTex
Feb 2020
#16
Umm, no they aren't. And if they are going to pull some brokered thing, I REALLY hope they
DanTex
Feb 2020
#22
I'm being direct because this is a message board. There are more civil ways to point out those
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#36
Unfortunately, the media and even other candidates are also jumping on the false "Bernie Bro"
DanTex
Feb 2020
#38
The problem for Sanders is that the Bernie Bro narrative isn't false, and pretty much everyone who
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#41
You can keep pretending it isn't a problem as long as you like. The media and debate focus on it
highplainsdem
Feb 2020
#43
Still using the old media canard, eh? It's a effective fallback to hide his failures.
LanternWaste
Feb 2020
#51
I'm not going to refuse to vote for the Democratic nominee if it turns out...
W_HAMILTON
Feb 2020
#21
The will of the electorate is the person that is able to amass the majority of delegates...
W_HAMILTON
Feb 2020
#33
Most Dems would be willing to risk the "Wrath of the Berners" than the risk of a Sanders nomination.
honest.abe
Feb 2020
#83
So, Bernie will blow up the Dem Party if he leads without a majority and doesn't get the nomination
Jersey Devil
Feb 2020
#20
I don't recall HRC reciting the number of pledged delegates she got when she endorsed Obama
ehrnst
Feb 2020
#32
Follow the rules is a perfectly good response to someone who is complaining about the
ehrnst
Feb 2020
#31
So you would also support ending the caucus system during the primaries, yes?. (nt)
ehrnst
Feb 2020
#66
Odd. Four years ago when he was behind, the story was completely opposite.
LanternWaste
Feb 2020
#53
Sanders was going for thsoe very rules end of 2016, right? Can't change them as the wind blows.
krissey
Feb 2020
#62
But Dan...if Sanders has a 27 or 30 % of the vote... and he is not leading in delegates as we
Demsrule86
Feb 2020
#68
The person with the most delegates AT THE END OF THE PROCESS is the winner...
SidDithers
Feb 2020
#79