Democratic Primaries

Bradshaw3

(7,964 posts)

54. Yes let's not look too hard at Bloomberg

Fri Feb 21, 2020, 11:17 AM

Feb 2020

We don't want to find out uncomfortable facts about him that might, oh I don't know, show him to be a terrible nominee.

I guess wanting to keep people from knowing the truth is good for drumpf. We don't want it for our nominee, especially when we have so many other good candidates who have better qualifications than "well he's not as bad a trump".

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Warren creates document to release people from NDAs with Bloomberg [View all] brooklynite Feb 2020 OP

This is absurd. The NDAs are not against him. He can't release them. Squinch Feb 2020 #1

I think Warren is on top of the law, don't you? denem Feb 2020 #2

Yes. That's why this is disappointing. She's better than this. Squinch Feb 2020 #3

Warren has released the text. denem Feb 2020 #4

The concept is legally defective. And she knows it is. She is Squinch Feb 2020 #5

The text is out there denem Feb 2020 #8

And you know this how? Bradshaw3 Feb 2020 #43

Yes, Bloomberg is clearly the victim here. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2020 #6

Sigh. Squinch Feb 2020 #7

No, you're wrong... brooklynite Feb 2020 #9

But he is neither party. The NDAs are not about incidents Squinch Feb 2020 #11

How do you know? yardwork Feb 2020 #12

Here: Squinch Feb 2020 #14

Yet Bloomberg responded, "Maybe They Didn't Like a Joke I Told". LiberalFighter Feb 2020 #17

Though we may not like that statement, it has nothing to do with what is being discussed. Squinch Feb 2020 #18

Nothing to do with it? That was his response about the women in his company with NDA's. LiberalFighter Feb 2020 #20

. backtoblue Feb 2020 #21

You know, that doesn't look good for Bloomberg at all. yardwork Feb 2020 #47

I agree. It doesn't look good in the same way that women saying Squinch Feb 2020 #48

Are you serious? You're saying all the Democratic candidates have a history of sexual harassment? yardwork Feb 2020 #49

Ran an organization where sexism was rampant? I just did. Squinch Feb 2020 #53

Bloomberg LP is a privately held company. Michael Bloomberg is the majority shareholder. brooklynite Feb 2020 #13

Thank you n/t Bradshaw3 Feb 2020 #44

Well - except for the one for this lawsuit...this one names him specifically, along with LP, jmg257 Feb 2020 #15

And the wide publication of documents and facts in that case suggest that there was no NDA. Squinch Feb 2020 #16

Not so sure that is acurate... jmg257 Feb 2020 #19

Of course, even if released from the NDA with Bloomberg, doesn't mean Garrison wants to talk... jmg257 Feb 2020 #22

She should've done this against...ahhhh, it'll come to me...oh yes, fucking trump months ago. brush Feb 2020 #51

Yes let's not look too hard at Bloomberg Bradshaw3 Feb 2020 #54

She made her point. trump is the real enemy here. Or are you forgeting all the dozens of women... brush Feb 2020 #55

Your rationalizations fall apart Bradshaw3 Feb 2020 #56

Since she's a lawyer she should know that the parties have to go to court. brush Feb 2020 #57

Again, what law school do you teach at? Bradshaw3 Feb 2020 #58

Again, is it worth it fighting another Dem. She's plateaued before. This could do it again. brush Feb 2020 #59

So despite your claims you are not a legal expert Bradshaw3 Feb 2020 #60

I never said I was. But why don't you address my comment about her plateauing again? brush Feb 2020 #61

They could pull a Stormy Daniels and break the NDA. Gloria Alread or the next Avenatti would Hoyt Feb 2020 #10

Did she create one for Spanky, too? greatauntoftriplets Feb 2020 #23

I can see it now... backtoblue Feb 2020 #24

Debate participants are not allowed to bring documents on stage. brooklynite Feb 2020 #25

It waa tongue in cheek backtoblue Feb 2020 #28

She needs to really stop...now she is lookig ridiculous and I like her...she should know that Demsrule86 Feb 2020 #26

Even if MRB and Garrison agreed to break their NDA, jmg257 Feb 2020 #31

Post removed Post removed Feb 2020 #35

Post removed Post removed Feb 2020 #27

If I were you, I'd take this down fast. It's a right wing smear against Liz who is a good candidate. Squinch Feb 2020 #29

Was a 2 second decision Dem2 Feb 2020 #32

They are among us! Squinch Feb 2020 #33

Still can't believe what I read Dem2 Feb 2020 #34

Post removed, not name removed. denem Feb 2020 #36

I was unable to see that Dem2 Feb 2020 #38

Must have been pretty bad denem Feb 2020 #40

You could guess Dem2 Feb 2020 #41

That dog won't hunt. denem Feb 2020 #42

Yep. Sounded an awful lot like Filthy Donnie. Squinch Feb 2020 #37

Listen Nikki28 Feb 2020 #30

I take Micheal Bloomberg at his word. denem Feb 2020 #39

She is vetting the right person Bradshaw3 Feb 2020 #45

Good post. blue neen Feb 2020 #46

This is primary season. They all want to be the nominee. yardwork Feb 2020 #50

Maybe Wareen can also press BS to release his medical records. N/T lapucelle Feb 2020 #52