Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
10. Back when I went to college (1960s), there was no tuition at the state colleges
Fri Apr 5, 2019, 01:47 PM
Apr 2019

in California. You still had to pay for room and board, books, and other expenses, and there was a modest fee each semester, but very modest.

The taxpayers of the state paid the rest. At the time, California has a progressive income tax, so wealthy people paid a higher percentage in taxes on their income. At the time, getting into a state college pretty much required a 3.0 GPA, as well. Room and board in my Freshman year was $600 total for each 3-month quarter. Books were expensive, but I bought used texts or used the textbooks in the library. My parents covered part of the expenses and my summer job covered the rest.

Not everyone went to college. I had been accepted at Cal Tech, but my parents simply said they couldn't afford that. No problem. The state college was good, too.

A lot of students went for two years at the local community college, or "Junior College" as it was called at the time. Then, if they did OK there, they'd transfer to one of the state schools. Kids with parents who were more affluent went to one of the many private colleges and universities. The University of California was another option. It cost somewhat more, and admission standards were higher. I chose a state college that was just a three-hour drive from my home town.

College was tuition free then, at least at state colleges in California. Getting that education, of course, was not completely free, and not everyone went to college.

My point here is that college was never free. In some places, like California, though, the state college system was primarily funded from income tax revenues in a progressive taxation system. The rich paid more. The poor paid nothing. I stayed in a dorm. Other students found other places to stay. Some students lived at home and went to a state college nearby. Many worked full-time jobs to pay for school, and you could do that in that economy. There was a way to go to college if you had a 3.0 GPA and some ingenuity. For those who didn't have the academic qualifications, Junior College for two years was how you could increase your GPA and gain admission.

Was the system fair? I don't know. It was what it was. That system no longer exists, though. More's the pity, I think.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
So much wrong with this: Merlot Apr 2019 #1
He does say college costs should be lower, so you are in agreement there. marylandblue Apr 2019 #7
So much wrong with the TITLE. We don't HAVE to agree on Hortensis Apr 2019 #30
I thought that's why we had campaigns and primaries. We OregonBlue Apr 2019 #2
Community college should be made easily accessible. MH1 Apr 2019 #3
Princeton uses it's large endowment to foot tuition for kids from Blue_true Apr 2019 #43
Kind of a dumb argument jberryhill Apr 2019 #4
Yes, he does realize that, but he's asking if that's the best use of our money. marylandblue Apr 2019 #8
That's still ridiculously simplistic jberryhill Apr 2019 #21
Yours is a long but simplistic response to an intentionally short post. marylandblue Apr 2019 #25
I like your reasoning on this. Blue_true Apr 2019 #45
For as smart as Mayor Pete is... Politicub Apr 2019 #37
One thing that can be done with tuition debt is Blue_true Apr 2019 #46
That's what I thought. LuvNewcastle Apr 2019 #41
Every economically-based argument in the world always has two sides ... mr_lebowski Apr 2019 #5
The concept of free college is great and hard to object to, but The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2019 #6
One solution is to have shorter courses, maybe 6 or 10 weeks. greymattermom Apr 2019 #27
But they'd still have to take enough cumulative classes to have learned something The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2019 #29
Let's focus on the dire priority of healthcare first. dubyadiprecession Apr 2019 #9
Back when I went to college (1960s), there was no tuition at the state colleges MineralMan Apr 2019 #10
So in summary it costs a lot so only people Voltaire2 Apr 2019 #11
Not everyone is cut out for college, but you can't get a well-paying job without it. marylandblue Apr 2019 #14
But oddly enough filthy rich bastards Voltaire2 Apr 2019 #17
No, we shouldn't allow people to commit felonious fraud, and marylandblue Apr 2019 #35
How about we let them figure that out without Voltaire2 Apr 2019 #36
I don't disagree. But any solution has social costs as well as benefits. marylandblue Apr 2019 #38
As a concept: free college its fine. Practically speaking, what does that actually mean? tymorial Apr 2019 #12
Would high school be okay at 11 grades? What about 13? jberryhill Apr 2019 #24
That makes no sense what so ever. Nt tymorial Apr 2019 #31
What makes it okay to fund education for 12 years, but not 16? jberryhill Apr 2019 #33
Oh, I understand now. Rather than debate my argument you resort to strawman tymorial Apr 2019 #34
This is the 21st century. dogman Apr 2019 #13
Even in the 21st century, we can't all work in STEM or management. marylandblue Apr 2019 #16
And in today's labor market they need training. dogman Apr 2019 #19
I agree. We need more of that. marylandblue Apr 2019 #20
That's why Bernie wants to make Unionization easier. dogman Apr 2019 #23
Not everyone is cut out for kindergarten Voltaire2 Apr 2019 #18
Nope, they want you to be able to tie your shoes first. dogman Apr 2019 #22
Seriously? jberryhill Apr 2019 #26
My grandsons had homework in kindergarten. greymattermom Apr 2019 #28
It should be free or significantly subsidized for those whose families cannot afford it Buckeyeblue Apr 2019 #15
I agree with subsidizing. People should pay something because it is a thing of value. If you UniteFightBack Apr 2019 #40
Well, I worked at a major corporation and we (in my area) hired IT professionals out of ... SWBTATTReg Apr 2019 #32
Missing the education angle jaceaf Apr 2019 #39
It doesn't make you rich, it does get you in the door. Voltaire2 Apr 2019 #48
I see his point. Blue_true Apr 2019 #42
A problem easily resolved by making community college free ecstatic Apr 2019 #44
He is looking at the bigger picture. WeekiWater Apr 2019 #47
Free college tuition at public colleges means Mr Tibbs Apr 2019 #49
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Pete Buttigieg argues aga...»Reply #10