Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Bernie Sanders and Sanctions [View all]
Sanders has a history of supporting sanctions, but he has voted against certain pieces of legislation on account of not wanting to endanger the nuclear agreement involving Iran and Russia.
And then there's this:
The fact that Bernie Sanders (I-VT) voted against the so-called Magnitsky Act of 2012 imposing targeted sanctions on Russian oligarchs to punish the Putin regime for human rights abuses is often cited as proof by liberal conspiracy theorists that Sanders was somehow culpable in the Kremlins targeted effort to damage the candidacy of Hillary Clinton as part of their broader attack on the 2016 U.S. election.
What liberal conspiracy theorists wont tell you is that Sanders was joined in voting nay by Carl Levin (D-MI), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Jack Reed (D-RI) none of whom stand accused by anyone of being Russian stooges.
What liberal conspiracy theorists wont tell you is that the Obama administration opposed the Magnitsky Act. The administration flip-flopped only after the sanctions were attached to a bill normalizing trade relations with Russia, hence the bills official name: The Russia and Moldova Jackson-Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012 (H.R. 6156).
What liberal conspiracy theorists wont tell you is that Sanders voted for a second, more robust version of the Magnitsky Act in 2015.
What liberal conspiracy theorists wont tell you is that Sanders was joined in voting nay by Carl Levin (D-MI), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Jack Reed (D-RI) none of whom stand accused by anyone of being Russian stooges.
What liberal conspiracy theorists wont tell you is that the Obama administration opposed the Magnitsky Act. The administration flip-flopped only after the sanctions were attached to a bill normalizing trade relations with Russia, hence the bills official name: The Russia and Moldova Jackson-Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012 (H.R. 6156).
What liberal conspiracy theorists wont tell you is that Sanders voted for a second, more robust version of the Magnitsky Act in 2015.
Much more at link.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders and other Dems who also voted no on various pieces of legislation have given reasons.
Garrett78
Feb 2020
#14
Taking flak and implying some conspiracy involving the Russian government are not one in the same.
Garrett78
Feb 2020
#32
Because right wingers clearly aren't the only ones who engage in conspiracy theorizing.
Garrett78
Feb 2020
#5
We're talking about a particular intelligence briefing. Not just the topic of Russian interference.
Garrett78
Feb 2020
#24
I'm sorry but the questions about his no votes on sanctions go way back. nt
UniteFightBack
Feb 2020
#16
He and other Dems (Whitehouse, Reed, etc.) have voted no on some and yes on others.
Garrett78
Feb 2020
#27
He supported a bill for sanctions that was rolled into another bill, which he voted "no" on.
TwilightZone
Feb 2020
#15
Thanks. I'll check it out. I'd have voted down all those NDAA's myself. They need to be broken
ancianita
Feb 2020
#21
No, they play games in building bills.They need to stop that practice and create clean bills. Period
ancianita
Feb 2020
#25
Every single mish-mashed bill is the politicizing of the people's business. Pelosi must stop it.
ancianita
Feb 2020
#30
Awesome. Please. You'd do DU and DPF a real solid by making this an OP. It will calm everyone down.
ancianita
Feb 2020
#28
No, it won't, sadly. That's what I was trying to do with this thread and the one about...
Garrett78
Feb 2020
#31