Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

(141,926 posts)

1. 'Some caucus sites reported a shortage of volunteers, and some precinct chairs were having problems

Sat Feb 22, 2020, 08:14 PM

Feb 2020

calling in their results. The Nevada Democratic Party said more results were expected “soon.”'

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/nevada-caucus-02-22?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does anyone know why the NYT site is stuck at 3% and CNN is reporting thousands.... [View all] LAS14 Feb 2020 OP

I really hope we start to replace caucus states with primaries still_one Feb 2020 #4

I agree, elleng Feb 2020 #5

Yup, very confusing still_one Feb 2020 #7

I don't know, but CNN.Com is at 10% if you are interested. :) Sloumeau Feb 2020 #2

Ah yes, I see... RobertDevereaux Feb 2020 #6

WSJ also at 3.2 % as I post this... RobertDevereaux Feb 2020 #3

Big difference in numbers too sweetloukillbot Feb 2020 #8

Even more confusing 10% final count, 1% county delegates. NT sweetloukillbot Feb 2020 #9

CNN is basing their count on network observers... brooklynite Feb 2020 #11