Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: The Nevada caucuses are a corrupt spectacle [View all]iluvtennis
(21,504 posts)14. Yes, the way the Nevada caucus was run is very unfair. From what I read on the process, the early
voters choices weren't factored in until after the first choice and realignment had been done by those in person caucus folks.
This means those who were in person at the caucus could drive what candidate was #1 viable candidate no matter if the early voter tallies for the precinct had a different #1 viable candidate.
In my opinion the NV caucus process is un democratic. Why should people in person at the caucus have more voting power than the early voters. It's not right.
Below excerpt is from this article - https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/how-do-nevada-caucuses-work-n1138216
How does the caucus work?
Democrats in Nevada caucus in much the same way as Democrats in Iowa. Caucus goers move around the caucus site, gathering in groups corresponding to the candidate that they support.
At most locations, candidates must have support from at least 15 percent of caucus goers in each precinct to be considered viable. Once all the attendees finish their first alignments, those with candidates who have reached viability are locked and cannot change their preferences. Those who are with nonviable groups (either a candidate or uncommitted) can realign with a viable group on a second alignment.
With those results, a formula awards delegates to viable candidates by precinct.
What about early voting?
There was an early voting window from Feb. 15 through Feb. 18. To vote early, a voter had to travel to one of the 82 early-vote locations, provided it was in the county in which they were registered. There was also one 24-hour early-vote site (at the Bellagio Hotel on the Las Vegas Strip) and several late-night locations for those who work odd hours in the Strip area. Read more about them here.
Early voters marked their first choice and at least two additional choices (up to four additional on top of their first choice) so their votes can be realigned if their top choices are not viable.
Early votes will be routed to the voter's home precinct on Caucus Day, so voters will be counted alongside their neighbors. That's different from Iowa, where the results of the "satellite caucuses" were counted as separate events.
*** Note the bold text *** The caucus goers set the viable candidate choices. The early voter choices (over 80,000 early voters) aren't reflected until the caucus goers set the viable candidate groupings.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Caucuses are undemocratic. Caucuses disenfranchise. Without a secret ballot...
NurseJackie
Feb 2020
#4
More than mere peer pressure the, um, "enthusiastic" bullies intimidate others as well...
NurseJackie
Feb 2020
#17
I know, I understand, if your chosen candidate had been the winner you would not have posted this
Perseus
Feb 2020
#9
This has nothing to do with Bernie Sanders, caucuses are undemocratic. Only about 10%
octoberlib
Feb 2020
#20
I don't like them either but it is what we have and because we don't like them we need to start
Perseus
Feb 2020
#31
Yes, the way the Nevada caucus was run is very unfair. From what I read on the process, the early
iluvtennis
Feb 2020
#14
Primaries with ranked voting. I wouldn't mind ranked voting for the general, either. n/t
MrModerate
Feb 2020
#15
Ranked preference voting is a great idea and a way to get more ideological diversity
Amishman
Feb 2020
#34
Only when all party members have a chance to participate is it a fair exercise.
NurseJackie
Feb 2020
#18
Closed primaries only! Enough with the ratfucking and vote suppressing chaos!
SunSeeker
Feb 2020
#23