Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

iluvtennis

(21,504 posts)
14. Yes, the way the Nevada caucus was run is very unfair. From what I read on the process, the early
Sun Feb 23, 2020, 08:13 PM
Feb 2020

voters choices weren't factored in until after the first choice and realignment had been done by those in person caucus folks.

This means those who were in person at the caucus could drive what candidate was #1 viable candidate no matter if the early voter tallies for the precinct had a different #1 viable candidate.

In my opinion the NV caucus process is un democratic. Why should people in person at the caucus have more voting power than the early voters. It's not right.



Below excerpt is from this article - https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/how-do-nevada-caucuses-work-n1138216

How does the caucus work?

Democrats in Nevada caucus in much the same way as Democrats in Iowa. Caucus goers move around the caucus site, gathering in groups corresponding to the candidate that they support.

At most locations, candidates must have support from at least 15 percent of caucus goers in each precinct to be considered viable. Once all the attendees finish their first alignments, those with candidates who have reached viability are locked and cannot change their preferences. Those who are with nonviable groups (either a candidate or uncommitted) can realign with a viable group on a second alignment.

With those results, a formula awards delegates to viable candidates by precinct.

What about early voting?

There was an early voting window from Feb. 15 through Feb. 18. To vote early, a voter had to travel to one of the 82 early-vote locations, provided it was in the county in which they were registered. There was also one 24-hour early-vote site (at the Bellagio Hotel on the Las Vegas Strip) and several late-night locations for those who work odd hours in the Strip area. Read more about them here.

Early voters marked their first choice and at least two additional choices (up to four additional on top of their first choice) so their votes can be realigned if their top choices are not viable.

Early votes will be routed to the voter's home precinct on Caucus Day, so voters will be counted alongside their neighbors. That's different from Iowa, where the results of the "satellite caucuses" were counted as separate events.


*** Note the bold text *** The caucus goers set the viable candidate choices. The early voter choices (over 80,000 early voters) aren't reflected until the caucus goers set the viable candidate groupings.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

KR!!! Cha Feb 2020 #1
K&R musette_sf Feb 2020 #2
Another clusterfuck. dalton99a Feb 2020 #3
Caucuses are undemocratic. Caucuses disenfranchise. Without a secret ballot... NurseJackie Feb 2020 #4
Peer pressure should have no place in voting. madinmaryland Feb 2020 #5
More than mere peer pressure the, um, "enthusiastic" bullies intimidate others as well... NurseJackie Feb 2020 #17
Which campaign would encourage its backers to employ such tactics? oasis Feb 2020 #6
The great campaign of the great man dalton99a Feb 2020 #7
"Peer pressure should have no place in voting"-- Indeed hlthe2b Feb 2020 #8
I know, I understand, if your chosen candidate had been the winner you would not have posted this Perseus Feb 2020 #9
No you don't understand Zorro Feb 2020 #10
This has nothing to do with Bernie Sanders, caucuses are undemocratic. Only about 10% octoberlib Feb 2020 #20
I don't like them either but it is what we have and because we don't like them we need to start Perseus Feb 2020 #31
I'm for BERNIE James48 Feb 2020 #11
K&R Firebrand Gary Feb 2020 #12
We need to boot the caucus thing completely. paleotn Feb 2020 #13
Yes, the way the Nevada caucus was run is very unfair. From what I read on the process, the early iluvtennis Feb 2020 #14
Primaries with ranked voting. I wouldn't mind ranked voting for the general, either. n/t MrModerate Feb 2020 #15
Ranked preference voting is a great idea and a way to get more ideological diversity Amishman Feb 2020 #34
In the best-of-all-possible-worlds... MrModerate Feb 2020 #35
Washington had both a caucus and a primary in 2016. LiberalFighter Feb 2020 #16
Only when all party members have a chance to participate is it a fair exercise. NurseJackie Feb 2020 #18
Exactly. nt SunSeeker Feb 2020 #24
+10 nt reACTIONary Feb 2020 #29
I thought 80,000 people voted early! B Stieg Feb 2020 #19
Caucuses work in small communities and small groups... Wounded Bear Feb 2020 #21
Caucus rules were agreed to by all prior to the election berni_mccoy Feb 2020 #22
It's not any particular set of rules that is the problem, it's ... reACTIONary Feb 2020 #30
Closed primaries only! Enough with the ratfucking and vote suppressing chaos! SunSeeker Feb 2020 #23
You're right about caucuses. PatrickforO Feb 2020 #25
Caucuses have long outlived their usefulness and relevance dlk Feb 2020 #26
the pressure on caucuses to report in the whirlwind news cycle is part of the problem Kurt V. Feb 2020 #27
I Certainly Don't Trust Them Me. Feb 2020 #28
Take a deep breath -- There are some redeeming values to the Caucus process mike507 Feb 2020 #32
Thanks for your helpful report. Was anonymity preserved scipan Feb 2020 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»The Nevada caucuses are a...»Reply #14