Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)

24. And this is at least the 4th such post. Where's the critical thinking?

Reply to bluewater (Reply #1)

Mon Feb 24, 2020, 04:22 PM

Feb 2020

Reports of 70,000+ voting early. Reports of Sanders winning easily. Math lesson, indeed.

Yet people still confuse county convention delegates with votes.

Bernie Derangement Syndrome is really screwing with people's heads.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Math lesson about Nevada results lesss than 2% turnout total [View all] JT45242 Feb 2020 OP

LOL Um, you seem to think only 13,000 people voted LOL bluewater Feb 2020 #1

And this is at least the 4th such post. Where's the critical thinking? Garrett78 Feb 2020 #24

Are they really "confusing" anything. bluewater Feb 2020 #26

you left out 70,000 early voters nt Fiendish Thingy Feb 2020 #2

How does this figure with 74,000 early voters in Nevada? I'm not... LAS14 Feb 2020 #3

Delete this. You are so so so wrong. squirecam Feb 2020 #4

You are correct. But 100K out of 600K active Democrats is still pathetic. pnwmom Feb 2020 #13

Perhaps squirecam Feb 2020 #17

And it's still up from 2016 Downtown Hound Feb 2020 #22

According to your link the total votes so far are 95,628 at 96% Moderateguy Feb 2020 #20

Now use actual vote totals (you are using delegates) Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2020 #5

Huh? What are you talking about? Are you KPN Feb 2020 #6

Post removed Post removed Feb 2020 #7

Someone on another site explained it this way Warpy Feb 2020 #8

no one has bragging rights with such an anemic turnout samnsara Feb 2020 #9

Do yourself a favor, don't believe everything you read on the internet. Downtown Hound Feb 2020 #10

But 100K out of 600K active Democratic voters is still anemic. And Bernie only got half of that, pnwmom Feb 2020 #16

Bernie got 1/3 of the vote. squirecam Feb 2020 #19

It's up from 2016, which was 84,000 Downtown Hound Feb 2020 #21

How much of that increased turnout TexasTowelie Feb 2020 #27

Those are SDE, not actual votes. The way this is being reported is confusing..... George II Feb 2020 #11

MSNBC and the other networks squirecam Feb 2020 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author LizBeth Feb 2020 #12

High voter turn out... jmg257 Feb 2020 #14

And, now for some not totally made up numbers: Downtown Hound Feb 2020 #18

Per Jon Ralston. 2008-118K. 2016-84K. 2020-100K. Midnight Writer Feb 2020 #23

I figured as much. Nt BootinUp Feb 2020 #25