Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

beastie boy

(13,283 posts)
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 03:21 PM Feb 2020

In Bernie Land, $42 Trillion in Revenue Pays for $97 Trillion in Spending [View all]

Under new pressure, Sanders released a document claiming to show how he pays for everything. It doesn’t come close.

After his train wreck 60 Minutes appearance when he couldn’t answer basic questions from Anderson Cooper about paying for some of his proposals, Sen. Bernie Sanders returned the next night while appearing on CNN and released a fact sheet claiming he can pay for all his new spending proposals. But, alas, conventional economic and budget analysis reveal that this claim is not remotely credible.

First, it is worth noting that Sanders’ spending promises total as much as $97.5 trillion over the decade. Sanders concedes that his Medicare For All plan would increase federal spending by “somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion over a 10-year period.” He has promised to spend $16.3 trillion on his climate plan. And his proposal to guarantee all Americans a full-time government job paying $15 an hour, with full benefits, is estimated to cost $30.1 trillion. The final $11.1 trillion includes $2.5 trillion on housing, $1.8 trillion to expand Social Security, $1.6 trillion on paid family leave, $1 trillion on infrastructure, $3 trillion to forgive all student loans and guarantee free public-college tuition, $800 billion on general K-12 education spending, and an additional $400 billion on higher public school teacher salaries.

Many of these spending estimates come directly from the Sanders campaign.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/in-bernie-land-dollar42-trillion-in-revenue-pays-for-dollar97-trillion-in-spending?ref=home
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boy, TPTB really don't want to lose their pittance of a tax raise to pay for their Hestia Feb 2020 #1
The current Federal budget is between $4-5 trillion. $30 to $40 trillion over ten years.... George II Feb 2020 #2
In Biden Land, he said yesterday he'll appoint the first African American woman to the US Senate. JudyM Feb 2020 #3
At least he's not making spending promises that he can't possibly keep. nt. dware Feb 2020 #5
He meant to say "US Supreme Court" and said "Senate" instead. AGeddy Feb 2020 #9
It's not a one-off. Remember the same thing in the debate? JudyM Feb 2020 #30
I'll take Biden gaffes over a socialist title any day. n/t zackymilly Feb 2020 #51
LOL. These Bernie-bashing articles keep getting more absurd. DanTex Feb 2020 #4
So lets see your facts refuting this. dware Feb 2020 #6
This guy works at a right-wing think tank and writes for National Review, and uses the DanTex Feb 2020 #8
I've seen Bernie's "facts" dware Feb 2020 #10
Where's your research? gredinger Feb 2020 #14
There are also peer reviewed studies that says Bernie's "facts" dware Feb 2020 #19
Where? gredinger Feb 2020 #21
I'm not talking about just M4A, dware Feb 2020 #25
Research now. gredinger Feb 2020 #26
Nope, my whole point is that Bernie is promising things he can't dware Feb 2020 #27
The Lancet article is an opinion piece. lapucelle Feb 2020 #36
So this isn't a "peer reviewed" study? dware Feb 2020 #37
Here's what Lancet says. lapucelle Feb 2020 #39
BS is actually cited in the references. lapucelle Feb 2020 #43
M4A isn't Medicare. TwilightZone Feb 2020 #28
In response to your failure to provide any independent, non-partisan analysis, ehrnst Feb 2020 #50
Well, the peer reviewed studies are with Bernie. But you have the right to your opinions. DanTex Feb 2020 #16
Also about Bernie "losing steam" LOL. We'll find out soon enough... dware Feb 2020 #38
Lol... No actual links to them? Well, never fear! Here are some you missed. ehrnst Feb 2020 #49
And Bros who hate the Democratic Party at The Intercept are "go-to sources here." ehrnst Feb 2020 #22
Bros? What? DanTex Feb 2020 #24
Brogressives. They are "for" themselves. ehrnst Feb 2020 #33
"Sometimes, The Brogressive will describe himself as "socially liberal, but fiscally conservative" DanTex Feb 2020 #34
No, the writers. At least some of them. ehrnst Feb 2020 #41
LOL. So now you're attacking women who write at Jacobin. Nice! DanTex Feb 2020 #42
Go after that straw man... ehrnst Feb 2020 #48
Medicare for All *saves* money. gredinger Feb 2020 #12
So someone who's been here for, what, 2 days, dware Feb 2020 #15
Research.... gredinger Feb 2020 #18
You posted a link to a removed page. lapucelle Feb 2020 #31
Welcome to DU! DanTex Feb 2020 #20
Democrats denying science makes me sad. gredinger Feb 2020 #23
That's not an "abstract" of a scientific study. It's a summary of an opinion piece by a BS advisor. lapucelle Feb 2020 #40
Since when expense estmates by economists have been accurate? at140 Feb 2020 #52
Acts of desperation by Biden boys. n/t MarcA Feb 2020 #13
Bernie Math! peggysue2 Feb 2020 #7
NYT-sanders plans do not add up Gothmog Feb 2020 #11
reminds me of that old vermont folk tune, there'll be pie in the sky by and by nt msongs Feb 2020 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author gredinger Feb 2020 #29
So is single-payer off the table? Steelrolled Feb 2020 #32
Not necessarily. But it appears it cannot be done on Bernie's terms. beastie boy Feb 2020 #35
KR! Cha Feb 2020 #44
Mahalo for your kicks, Cha! beastie boy Feb 2020 #45
No worries, beastie.. Cha Feb 2020 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author beastie boy Feb 2020 #47
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»In Bernie Land, $42 Trill...»Reply #0