Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: It was the Democrats' embrace of neoliberalism that won it for Trump [View all]TomCADem
(17,837 posts)15. How 'Neoliberalism' Became the Left's Favorite Insult of Liberals
As explained below, Neoliberalism has just become a catch-all epithet to attack Democrats from the "left" regardless of their underlying policy positions. You posted the article, then you complain that it is from 2016?
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/07/how-neoliberalism-became-the-lefts-favorite-insult.html
The neoliberalism of the 1980s and 1990s has faded into memory, as its adherents failed to settle on a coherent set of principles other than a general posture of counterintuitive skepticism. (Peterss new ideological manifesto, We Do Our Part, only mentions neoliberalism once.) But the term has been used to mean different things at different times, and it has returned to American political discourse with a vengeance. Then, as now, it is an attempt to win an argument with an epithet. Only this time, it is neoliberal that is the term of abuse.
And the term neoliberal doesnt mean a faction of liberals. It now refers to liberals generally, and it is applied by their left-wing critics. The word is now ubiquitous, popping up in almost any socialist polemic against the Democratic Party or the center-left. Obamas presidency? It was the last gasp of neoliberalism. Why did Hillary Clinton lose? It was her neoliberalism. Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz? Neoliberals both.
The Bafflers Chris Lehmann dismisses an Atlantic story on the Democrats, which touts Elizabeth Warren as a model for the partys future, as just more neoliberal tripe. In the world of neoliberal consensus, its a simple taken-for-granted axiom that senators the lead fundraisers and media figures in both major parties call the shots, and should be entrusted with charting an electoral comeback, writes Lehmann. All the reliable notes of arms-length cultural puzzlement are struck soundly here, from the putative identity-politics-class-politics divide on the left to the neoliberal wonk classs painfully absent common touch. Obviously, the authentic way to demonstrate a common touch is to throw around the term neoliberal as frequently as possible. Try it if you ever need to strike up a conversation with some strangers in a bowling alley in Toledo.
Neoliberalism is held to be the source of all the ills suffered by the Democratic Party and progressive politics over four decades, up to and (especially) including the rise of Donald Trump. The neoliberal accusation is a synecdoche for the American lefts renewed offensive against the center-left and a touchstone in the struggle to define progressivism after Barack Obama.
And the term neoliberal doesnt mean a faction of liberals. It now refers to liberals generally, and it is applied by their left-wing critics. The word is now ubiquitous, popping up in almost any socialist polemic against the Democratic Party or the center-left. Obamas presidency? It was the last gasp of neoliberalism. Why did Hillary Clinton lose? It was her neoliberalism. Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz? Neoliberals both.
The Bafflers Chris Lehmann dismisses an Atlantic story on the Democrats, which touts Elizabeth Warren as a model for the partys future, as just more neoliberal tripe. In the world of neoliberal consensus, its a simple taken-for-granted axiom that senators the lead fundraisers and media figures in both major parties call the shots, and should be entrusted with charting an electoral comeback, writes Lehmann. All the reliable notes of arms-length cultural puzzlement are struck soundly here, from the putative identity-politics-class-politics divide on the left to the neoliberal wonk classs painfully absent common touch. Obviously, the authentic way to demonstrate a common touch is to throw around the term neoliberal as frequently as possible. Try it if you ever need to strike up a conversation with some strangers in a bowling alley in Toledo.
Neoliberalism is held to be the source of all the ills suffered by the Democratic Party and progressive politics over four decades, up to and (especially) including the rise of Donald Trump. The neoliberal accusation is a synecdoche for the American lefts renewed offensive against the center-left and a touchstone in the struggle to define progressivism after Barack Obama.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, that whole first paragraph of factual hurtles they put up for HRC to get past.
LizBeth
Mar 2020
#1
"free trade," which is what the topic is, is not the same thing as free markets
wyldwolf
Mar 2020
#42
Ahem... yes, but Hillary did win the popular vote and got ratfucked out of her win by the EC.
abqtommy
Mar 2020
#8
I will never understand why anyone doubts that 2016 was almost entirely about the fake email scandal
StevieM
Mar 2020
#9
No, Naomi, deregulation, privatisation, and austerity are Republican policies.
SunSeeker
Mar 2020
#11
There was a mass migration in the past that left this site awkwardly moderate. nt
Gore1FL
Mar 2020
#47
So in other words, they couldn't stomach to be here when their Lord and Savior lost
wyldwolf
Mar 2020
#50
I frequent Mother Jones and Democracy Now! regularly so I'm familiar with Klein
pecosbob
Mar 2020
#21
BS supporters favorite insult (neo-liberal shill) right after "the establishment."
grossproffit
Mar 2020
#27
Typical Naomi Klein anti-Democratic partybbullshit, and of course another Guardian OP ED pushing
still_one
Mar 2020
#55