Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Uncle Joe

(65,338 posts)
29. In regards to progressive health care reform, the CBO has it shortcomings,
Wed Apr 10, 2019, 05:09 PM
Apr 2019

the picture they paint is incomplete.



(snip)

The CBO doesn’t follow the simple logic of only considering something part of the federal budget if it is directly paid for by the federal government. Nor does the CBO follow the basic logic of considering private activity part of the federal budget if it is required by federal law, like via an individual/employer mandate. Instead, the CBO considers health care reform an “essentially government program” if it crosses some arbitrary line of too much regulation.

According to a 2009 CBO paper on the topic, “insurance purchased through exchanges or in the private market—should be classified as federal revenues if there is an individual mandate and tight government control of the insurance market,” but not part of the federal budget if “there is an individual mandate and an active, loosely restricted private market, and if premiums are paid through nongovernmental exchanges or directly to insurers.”

In effect the CBO believes the government forcing you to pay premiums to insurance companies doesn’t make those premiums effectively a tax. But if the government also requires that private health insurance to actually be good, then it would be.

(snip)

CBO’s weird decision about what is or is not too much regulation was extremely detrimental to the ACA and is responsible for one of the changes made to the law during drafting. Senators initially wanted to require that 90 percent of premium dollars had to be spent on actual care — a medical loss ratio, which again, is well below international norms. The CBO wrote them a letter warning them that this regulation would push the ACA over their imaginary line. The CBO would have considered the entire insurance market part of the federal budget if that regulation was included. Thus legislators decided they would only use a medical loss ratio of 80-85 percent — a move that ended up actually costing the government significantly more.

(snip)


http://healthoverprofit.org/2019/01/09/cbo-will-score-all-health-reform-plans-as-nationalization/

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And he'll get this passed by.....? brooklynite Apr 2019 #1
Should Bernie win the Democratic Nomination and the G.E. that would signify a seismic shift Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #2
Trump won the Republican nomination and the G.E.... brooklynite Apr 2019 #4
Trump was/is an oligarch masquerading as a populist, Bernie will rip him up. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #6
We can debate Bernie's ability to win a Presidential Election seperately... brooklynite Apr 2019 #8
You can't separate the two, they're too intricately tied together. Bernie has beaten Trump Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #11
I can make an extremely informed assessment of the Election outcome... brooklynite Apr 2019 #14
1. Bernie is running against teen number of candidates, it would be virtually impossible Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #17
So has Biden. But the difference is Biden can take the rustbelt and deny Trump Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #46
31 house members elected in18 are self identified moderates. Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #47
You keep saying that, but I think you are getting cause and effect mixed up. ehrnst Apr 2019 #15
It's a circle, a seismic shift would get Bernie elected however Bernie being elected Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #19
A circle begins somewhere. And I'm not sure the "circle" you describe applies to all ehrnst Apr 2019 #20
The circle began with Bernie, very small in the beginning perhaps just a dot spinning around but as Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #22
So Senator Sanders is a planet now? ehrnst Apr 2019 #23
No ehrnst, Bernie is not a planet, it's called a metaphor Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #27
You get rather unhappy when some other people use metaphors. ehrnst Apr 2019 #52
I'm not unhappy about your metaphor down-thread ehrnst, it was just poorly conceived. n/t Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #55
Poorly understood. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2019 #57
he can say that Mexico will pay for it.. Fresh_Start Apr 2019 #3
If you wish to be serious here are some options that Bernie is proposing to pay for it. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #5
Thanks for posting this Uncle Joe billpolonsky Apr 2019 #9
Thank you billpolonsky Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #12
so which of those options do you believe are achievable? Fresh_Start Apr 2019 #10
Most or all of them depending on the political will of the American Nation and Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #13
But what if he doesn't win? Why is that necessary for the "political will of the American Nation" ehrnst Apr 2019 #26
Inspiring a movement is only the beginning. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #28
Al Gore would not have been able to focus on "An Inconvenient Truth" as POTUS. ehrnst Apr 2019 #49
Because, revolution! LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #56
A CBO score will be a bit more comprehensive, expert and objective. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2019 #24
In regards to progressive health care reform, the CBO has it shortcomings, Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #29
Your source of choice doesn't surprise me. It's one with a political agenda, for a specific bill... ehrnst Apr 2019 #33
Their mission is irrelevant to the point. If you have information to actually dispute their argument Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #36
Yes, their *mission* is relevant to their analysis. Why do you think they publish it on their site? ehrnst Apr 2019 #39
Are their facts correct or do you have facts to the contrary regarding the CBO's scoring Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #43
You sure don't apply that metric to a statement or analysis from WAPO or the Mercatus Institute ehrnst Apr 2019 #45
How will Warren get her childcare stuff passed? How will [Candidate X] get their [Policy Proposal].. TCJ70 Apr 2019 #21
Actually, no, it's not equally invalid criticism for every candidate's proposals. ehrnst Apr 2019 #50
Good on Sanders. WeekiWater Apr 2019 #7
Thank you Sen. Sanders & Sens Baldwin, Blumenthal, Booker, Gillibrand, Harris, Hirono, Heinrich, Nanjeanne Apr 2019 #16
63 that's five more than the OP article listed. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #18
Another bill that would die in the senate BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #25
People may like their doctors, nurses and hospitals but why would anyone like their Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #30
lol BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #31
To begin with, this doesn't answer my question as to why people would want to keep private Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #32
Many people like their private insurance. That needs to be acknowledged in any realistic ehrnst Apr 2019 #34
You never answered my question as to WHY they like it? Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #37
Why do you think I can answer for the people in the poll? ehrnst Apr 2019 #38
I'm just asking for your opinion, sorry for the discomfort. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #41
"You never answered my question as to WHY *they* like it?" ehrnst Apr 2019 #44
When football; kills tens of thousands of Americans every single year Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #53
They'd keep it because they like it redstateblues Apr 2019 #51
Whatever the "why," the reality is that they "do", and any reality-based legislation will ehrnst Apr 2019 #35
Not knowing the "why" makes it much easier for our current dysfunctional Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #40
Then why don't you request that someone do a poll? ehrnst Apr 2019 #48
I'm asking questions as to the motivation, if you don't have any answers, even just your opinion Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #54
I'm posting because I have things to say. ehrnst Apr 2019 #58
Yeah, it's probably a good time to do that. themaguffin Apr 2019 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»2020 presidential candida...»Reply #29