Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: 2020 presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders relaunches his Medicare-for-all health care [View all]Uncle Joe
(65,330 posts)37. You never answered my question as to WHY they like it?
What service to health care does that industry actually provide?
Do their profits and bureaucratic processes actually take away from health care?
If the goal is to get affordable, accessible health care to as many people as possible as soon as possible then nothing beats Medicare for All.
I think you may be forgetting that the actual goal is to get affordable, accessible health care to as many people as possible, as soon as possible. The goal of any serious health care reform legislation is "health care," not raining down punitive wrath upon private insurance companies. You seem to be opposed to anything that doesn't put insurance CEOs on hooks in the town square. I feel the same way about the NFL that you do about health insurance companies. I don't expect anyone to take me seriously if I stood up at my son's high school and said "Filthy lucre made by the NFL is not "profit," so much as blood money. We need to banish football from our team sports, because it feeds their fandom, and their BLOOD MONEY!!!!!!!" I would say, "Here are the stats on repetitive head injuries sustained in sports such as Football on future brain function, from non-partisan medical studies."
People have choices whether they play or view football, the same can't be said for health care when their lives depend on it.
The for profit "health" insurance industry is dysfunctional at its' core because it has no redeeming value in regards to health care and actually takes away from it.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
2020 presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders relaunches his Medicare-for-all health care [View all]
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
OP
Should Bernie win the Democratic Nomination and the G.E. that would signify a seismic shift
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#2
You can't separate the two, they're too intricately tied together. Bernie has beaten Trump
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#11
1. Bernie is running against teen number of candidates, it would be virtually impossible
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#17
So has Biden. But the difference is Biden can take the rustbelt and deny Trump
Demsrule86
Apr 2019
#46
It's a circle, a seismic shift would get Bernie elected however Bernie being elected
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#19
A circle begins somewhere. And I'm not sure the "circle" you describe applies to all
ehrnst
Apr 2019
#20
The circle began with Bernie, very small in the beginning perhaps just a dot spinning around but as
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#22
I'm not unhappy about your metaphor down-thread ehrnst, it was just poorly conceived. n/t
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#55
If you wish to be serious here are some options that Bernie is proposing to pay for it.
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#5
Most or all of them depending on the political will of the American Nation and
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#13
But what if he doesn't win? Why is that necessary for the "political will of the American Nation"
ehrnst
Apr 2019
#26
Your source of choice doesn't surprise me. It's one with a political agenda, for a specific bill...
ehrnst
Apr 2019
#33
Their mission is irrelevant to the point. If you have information to actually dispute their argument
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#36
Yes, their *mission* is relevant to their analysis. Why do you think they publish it on their site?
ehrnst
Apr 2019
#39
Are their facts correct or do you have facts to the contrary regarding the CBO's scoring
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#43
You sure don't apply that metric to a statement or analysis from WAPO or the Mercatus Institute
ehrnst
Apr 2019
#45
How will Warren get her childcare stuff passed? How will [Candidate X] get their [Policy Proposal]..
TCJ70
Apr 2019
#21
Actually, no, it's not equally invalid criticism for every candidate's proposals.
ehrnst
Apr 2019
#50
Thank you Sen. Sanders & Sens Baldwin, Blumenthal, Booker, Gillibrand, Harris, Hirono, Heinrich,
Nanjeanne
Apr 2019
#16
People may like their doctors, nurses and hospitals but why would anyone like their
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#30
To begin with, this doesn't answer my question as to why people would want to keep private
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#32
Many people like their private insurance. That needs to be acknowledged in any realistic
ehrnst
Apr 2019
#34
Whatever the "why," the reality is that they "do", and any reality-based legislation will
ehrnst
Apr 2019
#35